Project Age

On Jan 8/9 2021, my book “Project Age” will be free for your Kindle. Just find it on my author’s page per instructions on my WordPress home page. Also, you can simply look up my name on Amazon.com. (The problem with that is that there may be entirely too many distractions that way.)

A number of times, I tried to get someone else, a good author to write this book. When I failed, I decided it was important enough for me to write. I was, to be sure one of my more difficult books for me and I am afraid I didn’t do anywhere near as well as I hoped.

Nonetheless, there are many thoughtful passages as well as a few passages that just might be considered full of suspense. My purpose in writing it was to point out that things are not always as they seem. Sometimes, the government deceives us for our own good. That is to say, to keep us safe, they hide things from us as well as congress. I do wonder just how many congressmen had knowledge of the Manhattan Project (The first atomic bombs)

At any rate, in this book, there is a passage in which word gets out that Project AGE is an elixir that greatly retards the aging process. As anyone can imagine, there are many, especially in congress who should get the expensive and highly limited supply of the elixir.

I wonder. Does this remind you of the way it is with the vaccine developed for the China Virus. I mean, A.O.C., though under 40 just had to have her dose… to prove it was safe. Does anyone believe that? I don’t. There is one thing I certainly didn’t foresee, giving it to convicts before the rest of the populous. I guess the criminals came up with that idea, or maybe their lawyers.

I’m 73, I have high blood pressure and I’m diabetic. I actually do have a reason to want to be one of the first. However, I am patient. I’ll wait until all those greedy souls get theirs. It sort of works out the same anyway. After everyone else is inoculated, there is no one for me to catch it from.

At any rate, I figure it is good for everyone to fight it out. We all will find out just what they are made of, when it really comes right down to it. It is clear that A.O.C. is one of those who thinks of no one but herself. Also, she just might be one of those who lets fear rule her life.

To be sure, there are others like A.O.C. I guess she is just one of the most obvious.

By the way, it is worth noting that all those dummycrats were full of it before the vaccine was released. They said they would have no part of it because it was developed by President Trump. Now it would seem they would take it no matter who developed it. As I said, it tells us what they are made of.

One more thing. Imagine, if you will, the real commotion in the event there were actually an anti-ageing elixir. It might actually come down to some real bear knuckle contests. It might also cause some real racial divides. I don’t know. We can only imagine.

Laws Without Teeth

When I was much younger, I never thought about it much. As I get older, and hopefully wiser, I started thinking of laws more.

Let’s see. In a little more perfect world, there would be no need to put teeth to lays… not one need to enforce them. Consider a law against robbery without the need of a threat of penalty. All you need is a law against murder and murders would cease. Imagine a world where we could make laws against speeding without the need to enforce them.

It wouldn’t be long before there would be little need for policemen. After all, there job is law enforcement. They and the courts supply the teeth to the law. If everyone just simply obeyed all laws that are passed, think of all the money we would save. The need for lawyers would be drastically reduced if not completely eliminated.

The truth is that a law that is not enforceable has no purpose. Moreover, a law that is not enforced may as well not exist.

Think of all those who have been rioting and calling it demonstrating. Consider the looting and arson. Thousands, maybe tens of thousands are guilty and few were ever arrested. Fewer yet were prosecuted. Over the months, I wonder, just how many ever spent a day in jail. They have all become laws without teeth. The offenders of the law realize it and they are taking full advantage of it. It has rendered the law void, useless. It would seem we have decided to let the lawless get away with anything while those obeying the law suffer.

However, it is far more than that. It is against the law to vote in one state while you live in another. They law would seem to have teeth. There are penalties for such things. Yet they are not enforced. So, when people realize they can do it and not suffer the consequences when caught, the law is voided. It is as if it doesn’t exist. Hence the lawless effectively rewrite our laws.

Moreover, some laws are written completely without teeth. You look at the code and there is no punishment designated. So the Pennsylvania secretary of state intentionally disobeys the voting laws and openly admits it. Law enforcement cannot even slap his hand. They are powerless to do a thing, that is, even if they want.

And of course, the Supreme Court sits in their ivory tower and refuses to do nothing. And now… we have become a nation without voting laws. As the man said, “He who counts the ballots wins the election.” And, as I said before, only those who obey the law suffer.

The Smartest People in the World

You ever notice how the democrats claim to be so smart, indeed they claim to be the smartest people in the world. They want to run your lives because you lack the ability to make basic decisions.

Then, when you catch them with the goods, when you catch them with their hand in the till, when you catch them breaking the law, then they plead the Sgt Schultz defense…”I know nothing.” “I don’t recall.” “I didn’t know.” “You mean my son is a crook?”

Concerning the voter frauds. Biden asks, “What fraud? I don’t see any fraud. I won that election fair and square.” The truth he knows better. After all, he is one of the smartest men in the world. If he can’t figure it out, actually he’s pretty dumb. Over half the country figured it out. If he doesn’t know, that would put him in the lowest fifty-percentile in the country.

Of course if you find any of them next to a dead body, it is slightly different. They suddenly become blind. “What dead body. I don’t see a dead body. Do you see a dead body? I can’t imagine how that got there.”

Some may say they are not responsible for any deaths. To those, I suggest you get your vision checked. Obama let over a million die. Ms. Clinton let at least four die, I would suspect more. The governor of New York State let thousands die in nursing homes. Not one of them will own up to it. Not one of them feels the least of a twinge of guilt. Instead, they ask, “What dead bodies? Does anyone see any dead bodies?”

Progression

  1. There was absolutely no voter fraud.
  2. Well, maybe there was a little fraud.
  3. There was not enough fraud to make any difference.
  4. Maybe there was enough fraud to overturn one state, but not the election.
  5. Well, possibility, there was enough to overturn the election, but Trump doesn’t deserve another term.
  6. Okay, they really muffed it, but it was all just a bunch of mistakes. No one did it on purpose.

There is an old saying around computers. I don’t know who first said it, but I suspect anyone who has been around computers any length of time knows it, “To err is human. To really mess things up it takes a computer.”

Certainly this election has proved the case. It would seem that there are more votes in some precincts than there are people, let alone qualified voters.

Fraud certainly is not new. Long before computers men were finding ways of cheating. After the Civil War, Black people were paid to vote 8 or 10 times. The Black man shouldn’t be blamed. He didn’t know any better.

You would think, after 200 years we’d start figuring out ways of keeping elections honest. The problem is that the democrats don’t want it to be honest. If they couldn’t cheat, how could they win?

Nonetheless, the voting machine has added a whole new dimension to cheating. The advantage of the computer is that it is fast. Hence, it allows the democrats to cheat much faster. Moreover, the computer leaves no paper trail. No matter how many times you do a recount, it always comes up the same. …another computer adage. GIGO (Garbage in, garbage out)

Apparently, that was not enough, because this time, they came up with the mail in ballot. This is where, if I find a ballot in the mail, even if it is not addressed to me, I can fill it out and send it in.

Apparently, there were many folks who did this. People, when they arrived physically at the pole, they said, you can’t vote. You already sent your ballot in. Now, how did that happen?

…and the story continues. Indeed, it might be the downfall of The United States. Abe Lincoln warned us of it. He said that if this nation will fall, it will be from within. It just might be that the warning turned to prophecy.

Oh, yes. One more thing. THE REPORTERS WERE IN CAHOOTS WITH THE DEMOCRATS RIGHT UP TO THEIR ELBOWS, OR MAYBE SHOULDER. It is ever conceivable that they were partially be hind it.

Remember the Three Monkeys?

I hadn’t heard about them lately, but when I was younger, they were a common subject. One monkey covered its eyes and the caption under it was, “See no evil.” The second one covered its ears and the captions was, “Hear no evil.” The third one had its hands over its mouth with a caption of, “Speak no evil.”

The original concept has little to do with what I have to say today. Yet, it still applies. Obviously, if you have your eyes covered, you will see no evil. If you have your ears covered, in theory, you will hear no evil. Finally, if you keep your mouth covered, you will speak no evil.

The above is true whether or not it is good. For instance, the witness who covers his eyes cannot see the robbery, and hence he is no help to the police in finding the thief. Strangely, many witness act as the monkey with his eyes covered. When the policeman asks if he saw or heard anything, he assumes the position of the third monkey and clams up.

On the other hand, there are those who are intentionally blind. They close their eyes and ears to the crime that occurs right in front of them because they benefit, or they believe they will benefit from the crime.

Four F.I.S.A. false applications were submitted to the court and no one, but no one seems to know how it happened. It is sort of an extension of the three monkeys, “Read no evil.” Maybe we can say they were all doing there imitation of Sergeant Schultz in the old series, Hogan’s Heroes, “I see nothing. I see nothing.” I would guess that the whole of the seventh floor of the FBI is maned by hundreds of clones of Sergeant Schultz. The alternative thought is that they were a bunch of monkeys covering their eyes. You take your pick. Either way, by their own admission, they neither saw, heard or knew anything. I guess we must conclude that they covered their eyes for all four applications.

So now we are in the midst of a post election fog. The democrats have completely destroyed the faith the majority of us had in our election process and all the democrats can say is that they see no evidence of fraud. Of course they don’t. They are assuming the position of the monkey and they are covering their eyes. Guess what. If you close your eyes, cover them and look away, of course they see nothing. (There is no one so blind as those who will not see.)

Some say, there is very little fraud. That’s stupid. Are we supposed to ignore a crime because there is so little of it. Every person who commits fraud in an election should be prosecuted. Moreover, if a pattern develops, we must assume there is someone behind it.

If we find a broad pattern of it, as is now developing, it only stands to reason that the democrats are behind it. All those who disobeyed the law should be investigated and prosecuted, especially if they were sitting in a big luxurious office with his feet propped up at the time of the crime.

It just might help them and others see better during the next election. Of course, there is no need for Biden to do anything wrong. The country is full of people who gladly do it for him, possibly to the point of going to jail.

Willing to Leave the Office

Many times, I have heard the question, “If you lose, are you willing to concede. Never did I hear it asked of a democrat. I suspect I never will. More important, the democrats have already demonstrated that they are sore losers. When President Bush took office, one of the first things he had to do was to repair the computer keyboards. Clinton’s staff were sore losers and they never apologized for what they cost the public.

Clinton confronted nominee Trump about his willingness to accept the outcome, but Clinton decided that the constitution should be changed to allow her to move into the White House. To this day, she continues to pout and complain reminding us that she won the popular vote.

Truth be told, she probably didn’t win that. I imagine there were a few dead people that voted for her. Oddly, the dead always vote democrat.

Now, the completely impartial moderator of the debate asked the same question of the president, but not the former vice-president. (Is he really impartial?)

And then of course there’s Clinton, the one who was cheated out of the 2016 election. She says, “No matter what, don’t concede.” I don’t know about others, but that sounds like she is encouraging Bidden to refuse to accept the results. Then again, maybe it is code for, “Just wait a while. We will manufacture all the votes you need, even if we have to wake up a few dead people.”

And they wonder why we expect fraud.

Compromise, Maybe?

The democrats like to use the word compromise, as long as they come out on the winning end of it.

Well, maybe I can suggest a compromise. The democrats want to dump ballots out of low-flying aircraft. The Republicans want to appoint a justice right away.

So this is the compromise. The democrats agree, no mail out ballots and the president will wait until after the inauguration to appoint another justice. That has two benefits. We have a proper and fair election and, in the event that there are problems, the current 8 justices can help make sure it is settled properly, in spite of the lawyers.

Somehow, I don’t think the democrats will accept the terms but I may be wrong. If they feel they will win the election fair and square, they might go for it. At this point, though, with Bidden as their champion, I suspect they have their doubts of being able to make it through the first debate.

They want the mail out ballots, not so much to beat Trump, though they would love that. Their purpose is to keep the House and flip Senate. To do that, they know they will need some good old fashioned cheating. They know they will need the votes of a few dead men and a few illegal aliens.

What is it they always like to use in those detective shows? Modus Operandi, also known by us non-lawyers as a method of doing things. Well, it is the way democrats do things, ever since they found out it works.