Biden Wants to Talk About the Rise in Crime Today

I heard over the news that Biden wants to address the country on the rise in crime and how to decrease it. It is nice to know that he has finally managed the first step, recognizing that the problem exist.

I can help him on how to resolve the problem.

  1. Never mind the guns. Lock up the criminals. It just might amaze him as to how much good this would do. Oddly, it even helps the criminals.
  2. Seal the border. Many criminals are finding their way into our country and committing crimes here. Frequently they bring guns with them. This point is so simple a first grader could figure it out. Also, drugs are a big part of the crime. Stop the drugs from entering the country and the crime will decrease.
  3. Tell his friends, the Chinese to stop importing fentanyl. They provide most of the supply and it is not because they want to do us any favors. It is possible for one nation to take over another with little more than the use of drugs. At the least he is using them to weaken us.

My guess is that Biden will not do any of these things. He will blame it all on President Trump and tell how important it is to control guns.

Consider the following: If all the guns are locked up, the crime will continue. If all the criminals are locked up, the crime will cease or at least greatly decrease.

By the way, speaking of borders, where is Kamala. Obviously, she does not want to be associated with that fiasco she was put in charge of. Obviously, she has done not one thing to improve it. Come to think of it, I think that is the plan.

I’m still waiting for someone to put Fauci in that orange jumpsuit. Actually, I wouldn’t mind if it is yellow. In a way, that is more suitable for the likes of him.

Friends of Criminals

I have a new term for the dems. I used to use dummycrat and the name does fit. However, those that own this website don’t seem to like it. Every time I try to use the tag, they stop the post. So, I’ve decided to use Friends of Criminals henceforth, FOC for short. My wife suggested FOE, which also fits somewhat, but I would guess FOC is better. The neat thing is, at least for the meantime, no one will keep me from using the FOC tag or category.

At any rate, the tag is more appropriate. Who else provided the criminals with such things as: no bond, no charges for setting cities afire and stealing things right in the open, unlawful voting, unlawful border crossing and last but not least, smuggling of deadly drugs such as fentanyl. In essence, they have been aiding and abetting the the cartels from before Biden moved into The White House.

People are dying and neither Biden nor his vice-president cohort cares. It is all about power. Then too, Fauci is guilty of death of millions and Biden has not so much as suggested firing him, let alone locking him up. Fauci is very lucky to have FOCs, but that luck will not last forever. Then he will have the anger of, not just the US, but the entire world down on him. He will not be able to find a friend or a place to hide. Maybe he should take the hint from the doomsday preppers and find himself a very deep hole where he can hide.

On a little different subject, those FOCs really ought to understand one of the most effective assault weapons, the hand. It would seem it is used far more often then any gun here lately. Some have been been using their fists to attack at will anyone they decide to and no one seems to care, beyond those injured, their relatives, the police and most republicans. To be sure, the dems are the Friends of Criminals.

Election Audits, What Ifs

If I have heard it once, I’ve heard it a thousand times, “No evidence of fraud.” To which I respond, “If you never look for fraud you will likely never find it, especially if you intentionally turn your head at the hint of it.”

At any rate, in Arizona, they have been doing a very serious audit. To the best of my knowledge, the dems, especially those in charge of the election are doing all they can to avoid the audit. I don’t know about others, but to me that smells. It smells like something rotten.

Moreover, it would seem even before they got a good start, they have found evidence of tampering, such as missing ballots by the thousands. Moreover, after taking a better look at the Georgia election, the Georgia Sec. of State has some explaining to do…like what happened to all those chain of evidence documents.

Okay. Maybe there is not yet any evidence of fraud. However, there is already plenty of evidence of improper election procedures in at at least five states, which would be more than enough to overturn the election. Oh. And by the way, they just might find some of that evidence that one and all keep saying doesn’t exist.

That provokes the question, “What if?”

To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing in the constitution or in the statutes that would cause Biden to vacate The White House. Indeed, even if they prove he was behind it, it would take an impeachment to have him removed. Moreover, given those that might succeed him, I’m not sure anyone would want that to happen, at least not until there is a republican Speaker of the House.

As near as I can tell, there is simply no way that the election could be reversed this late in the game. If such a thing did happen, I’m not sure what the results might be. I mean, the dems are prone to suggest riots in the streets and if they had such a reversal, the threat just just might come to pass. I simply do not know if our nation could stand such a upheaval.

However, if the proof were uncovered, it would accomplish at least four things.

  1. Some of the guilty just might find themselves in orange jumpsuits. This in itself might discourage future hanky-panky.
  2. It would shut the mouths of those claiming no fraud here. It should embarrass them, but it won’t. Nothing will. However, they never will have an ounce of credibility again. Their words will forever contain the ring of being being counterfeit.
  3. Most important, there would be justification for positive changes in voting laws. When it is suggested that picture IDs should be required, they will not be able say there is no fraud. (I refer to bullet point 2)
  4. The dems will have egg all over their faces. There is no way that such fraud could have been made on the voters of the nation unless they were fully behind it. It just might result in a change in the voter registration. On the other hand, that just might be wishful thinking. When people have a D after their name, they can get away with most anything.

By the way, where is that written apologize from the media and social media media for putting their filters on the China virus? I have not yet heard one, though they have a tendency to required them from us.

By the way, why is Fauci not yet fired. Why is he not net in an orange jump suit. He played a big part in the loss of millions of lives and I have not yet heard an apology from him either. When you come right down to it, I don’t think he feels an ounce of remorse. Many have shed tears of grief because of what he did. From him, not so much as a hint of a tear. He has walked away from his crime and likely will not pay a dime for it.

Selection Criteria

I was watching “The Five” on FOX earlier tonight and I heard a quotable quote by (I think) Katie Pavlich. If I am wrong please forgive me. The quote might not be exact so I won’t use quotation marks.

Speaking of Kamala Harris, she said that this is what you get when you select a running mate by gender and skin color.

I believe that the plan was for Harris to take over when Biden is forced to step aside. Now, I suspect that is no longer true. We now know why Kamala had to bow out of the presidential race in December, I think before the first primaries. Now, apparently they see that that plan won’t work. The American citizens likely think less of her than Biden. Now what do they do when their best hope has a problem giggling every time she gets nervous?

Nonetheless, let’s go back to Katie Pavlich’s insightful remark, which incites us to think a little beyond the remark. Now, let’s see. Do I want to select a surgeon because he is black. Do I want to select a lawyer based on gender. Oddly, there is some logic here. In some cases, a female lawyer just might give me a head-start before the jurors. Even so, I still think I would prefer the more capable lawyer, regardless of gender.

Then, of course, there are those selected indirectly. Would we feel safer in a plane if we knew an African-American was at the controls. On the other hand, we might prefer a woman to be at command of that 6 thousand mile flight. I don’t get to make that decision. It is made by the airline. Hopefully, when they did they chose the better pilots and not based on color or gender.

It is perhaps, one of the worst side effects of forced integration. Forcing a company to hire a black woman to work in a restaurant might not have horrible results, but it can be devastating if a black woman is not qualified to fly that 757 aircraft. To be sure, she might be able to handle the day-to-day flights, but what happens in an emergency. In such situations you want the best person at the controls, not someone who was selected because of color or gender.

Now, the big question. Do we really want Kamala at the controls of this country, knowing that she was selected because she is a half-black woman? Let’s face it, when Biden searched for a running mate, he made it clear that those were the only two requirements.

I have no problems with a black woman serving as vice-president or even president. Let’s just make sure she can answer a serious question or two without giggling like a school girl.

As a side note, I have had a number doctors who were women and a couple who were black. They all seemed well qualified and I would not have hesitated to recommend them. On the other hand, there were a few white doctors that I will never see again. I have never, to my knowledge had a black pilot. Then again, as I said, that was not my choice. Also, I have not done much flying.

A Matter of Priorities?

We all know where the dems interests are. They want investigation after investigation of Jan 6 and the overrunning of the Capital Building. (Only four people died.)

On the other hand, when it comes to the millions that died in the pandemic, they want to turn their eyes from those most likely culpable. This is especially true when it just might involve one of their heroes, Fauci. (Why is he not in an orange jumpsuit?) This is also because it involves their hero nation, China. (Why are we still doing business with them?) And by the way, why is it that we were giving them money for virus research?

I guess it is all just a matter of priorities. We now know where the dem’s heart is. Those who like to experiment with dangerous viruses and then blame others for the results. As for the millions who died, they are just statistics, as Joseph Stalin liked to put it. They used the stats on their primary opponent, President Trump.

To my way of thinking such experiments should take place on barges far out to sea. Better yet, they ought not take place at all. Most of all, we don’t need to help our enemies develop such horrid things… for any reason… certainly not for weapons.

Kamala Is Headed South

The word is that she is going down to Central America to resolve all the reasons for people flooding over our border. Don’t believe it. She’s been working so hard doing VP things that she needs to vacate for a while. And so it is she will spend a few days in a luxury hotel and eating the best quality food at our expense. On the side of course, she will get a few photo ops and say a few nice words.

Then, after messing things up down there, she’ll return claiming all the good she did.

Reasons Not to Work

It would appear we have a large supply of potential employees as well as a large number of job openings. I have heard a number of possible reasons for this: people getting paid for doing nothing seems to be right at the top of the list. However, there are two other possibilities that no one has talked about, leastwise to the best of my knowledge. The one that most readily comes to me are the masks. I am 73 and I find it very difficult to breathe in those things. After an hour or so I just have to take mine off regardless of any law.

I had considered taking on a part-time job to help with my Social Security income, but I know of nowhere that would hire me unless I wear a mask. Because of the requirement, I would suspect there are many that simply will not work because of the respiratory stress it causes. Maybe, now with the shots, this problem will go away. Still, I suspect there are places that will still require the masks.

Although I do not know of anyone who has the second reason, I suspect there are many. There are many these days that cut lawns for money, or simply provide landscaping services. If they are providing these services under the table, so to speak, they could have two sources of income. By the way, do not belittle landscaping as a method of income. Some people make a lot of money at it. If the truth be told, some or all of the money made doing this might not get reported to Uncle Sam. After all, many of those doing the work are not here legally.

And so, by not going back to the legitimate job, some just might be drawing from the government and making a dollar or two on the side. Am I wrong? I can’t prove my suggestion. Then again, I doubt there is anyone that can prove me wrong either.

Let’s face it, government regulations and laws do have a tendency to create underground economies, legal or not. The hitch in this for American citizens is that much of this trade is being taken from them by illegal aliens willing to work for less money.

So it would appear that those who continue to pay them to do nothing are also the same ones making it difficult for them to make a dollar or two under the table. Who’d guess. The democrats making it hard for the poor to make a dollar or three on the side, illegal though it might be.

A Sterile Kiss?

I saw a video last night. It was on a news program. It was of Kamala kissing her husband.

No big deal, right? They still had their masks on. Both of them. Really? And people ask me why I call them dummycrats.

I guess they were afraid of catching each other’s germs. I’m sure the masks were adequate protection. As for me, their logic underwhelms me.

DeRoy Murdock Said Something Worth Repeating

The Dems like to say they want to compromise. Well DeRoy Murdock came up with an excellent idea, though he might not have meant it as a compromise.

The Dems claim that the people who live in Washington DC get taxed but they get no meaningful representation. Well, what Mr. Murdock suggest is that we don’t tax the people who legitimately live within the limits of district.

I would suggest that the Federal government would not miss the revenues and it would be good for the city. People might even move there in an effort to make money instead of bribing congressmen. To be sure, those who want to live outside city and lobby would not be eligible. They would actually have to move in and become residents year-round.

Now let’s see. It would drive the value of the land up. It would somewhat extract all the liberals out of Virginia and Maryland. Moreover, it might actually result in some industry the city besides politics and tourism. It would also free monies to go for city infrastructure.

The thing is, who knows what all would happen after a few capitalist decide to move in and replace the liberals. They might actually have a city befitting of our great nation.

Thing is, it will never happen. Like all good ideas, the dems won’t let it happen. Besides, what they really want has nothing to do with the representation of the citizens of the district. It is all about power. If the district were to be added as a state, the dems would pick up another representative and two senators. To them, that is power. So, never mind the great idea. Their idea of the important thing is to keep control of both chambers and the presidency. Then of course, they will want the Supreme Court as well. That way, their kingdom will be complete and no one will be able to stand against them, other than China.

Oh. Did I mention they already control the media. What little conservative media remains will have to transmit from a ship off shore. It will become Radio Free America. Invariably, it will need to put up with harassment from the Union of Socialist America