It may seem strange, but I now realize there are democrats that absolutely won’t lie, the K-9 variety. However, I do have it on great authority that they do vote illegally. Very few dogs reach the age of 18. Hence they are too young to vote. It is another reason we should insist on picture IDs.
Tag Archives: Elections
Please Excuse Me if I Seem a Bit Dull
Over and over, the one time after the other, I keep hearing these people on TV say things about it being so horrible that illegal aliens are voting.
To be sure, it is a bad thing for anyone to allow an illegal alien to vote, but does that mean we are supposed to let legal aliens vote. Seems to me, the primary requirement to vote is that a person be a citizen, born or naturalized, in order to vote. It seems to me that, at least in national elections, aliens -legal or not- should not be allowed to vote.
Then, of course, why should I have anything to say on the matter.
Laws Without Teeth
When I was much younger, I never thought about it much. As I get older, and hopefully wiser, I started thinking of laws more.
Let’s see. In a little more perfect world, there would be no need to put teeth to lays… not one need to enforce them. Consider a law against robbery without the need of a threat of penalty. All you need is a law against murder and murders would cease. Imagine a world where we could make laws against speeding without the need to enforce them.
It wouldn’t be long before there would be little need for policemen. After all, there job is law enforcement. They and the courts supply the teeth to the law. If everyone just simply obeyed all laws that are passed, think of all the money we would save. The need for lawyers would be drastically reduced if not completely eliminated.
The truth is that a law that is not enforceable has no purpose. Moreover, a law that is not enforced may as well not exist.
Think of all those who have been rioting and calling it demonstrating. Consider the looting and arson. Thousands, maybe tens of thousands are guilty and few were ever arrested. Fewer yet were prosecuted. Over the months, I wonder, just how many ever spent a day in jail. They have all become laws without teeth. The offenders of the law realize it and they are taking full advantage of it. It has rendered the law void, useless. It would seem we have decided to let the lawless get away with anything while those obeying the law suffer.
However, it is far more than that. It is against the law to vote in one state while you live in another. They law would seem to have teeth. There are penalties for such things. Yet they are not enforced. So, when people realize they can do it and not suffer the consequences when caught, the law is voided. It is as if it doesn’t exist. Hence the lawless effectively rewrite our laws.
Moreover, some laws are written completely without teeth. You look at the code and there is no punishment designated. So the Pennsylvania secretary of state intentionally disobeys the voting laws and openly admits it. Law enforcement cannot even slap his hand. They are powerless to do a thing, that is, even if they want.
And of course, the Supreme Court sits in their ivory tower and refuses to do nothing. And now… we have become a nation without voting laws. As the man said, “He who counts the ballots wins the election.” And, as I said before, only those who obey the law suffer.
Some Folks Just Can’t Run an Election
It would appear that the Georgia secretary of state doesn’t know how to run an election. Actually, that fella in Pennsylvania doesn’t understand how either. We here in Mississippi might not know a few of those fancy things those boys in Georgia can do, but our election went off without a hitch. Most of the results were in by midnight. That fella in Georgia counted the votes three times and still got it wrong.
I’m sure if y’ll in Georgia need help, our secretary of state can teach ya. That goes for all y’ll up north like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin too.
By the way, Alabama got it right the first time too. I’m not sure when they were done, but my guess is you fellas were only about half done with your first count.
Well, I must admit, y’ll did have problems with that ‘water main.’ Glad to hear no one drowned. Still, that slowed you but a couple of hours. From what I understand, no one needed any boats after the minor flood.
Also, of course, y’ll have such massive populations. All y’ll had a lot more voters than Mississippi. I know how that works. You have twice the voters so it takes four times longer. I think all those fancy mathematicians call that exponential or something like that.
However, if that’s true, how did Florida get done so fast. And by the way, no one doubts their outcome. And, oh yes. Texas got done in a hurry too. No doubts about their results, either.
On the other hand, from what I understand New York is still counting votes. It seems every time they get done, they find another dozen ballots. California really isn’t doing much better, though I do think most of their races are settled. Then, mostly it doesn’t matter in most of those races who wins. With just a few exceptions, no matter who wins it’s a democrat… or might as well be.
I simply don’t understand it. How is it that a man with a college degree can’t run a fair & equitable election that people can trust. The truth be known, I don’t think any of them wanted to. If they did, Trump would have won and they didn’t want that. They wanted to put their fingers on the scale enough to put Biden in. Their plot just might have backfired in their faces. At this point, I doubt anyone with a brain would ever trust them to run a state fair. Come to think of it, it is probably easier to run an election than a state fair.
Doth Protest Too Much
The lady doth protest too much, me thinks.
It is a familiar line from Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, third act, second scene. Lest you get the wrong idea that I am some kind of Shakespeare expert, I am no fan of his. In fact, I hated it when we had to read Julius Caesar in high school.
Nonetheless, I must admit that the man could turn a phrase or two. I would have simply said, “She protests too much,” and leave it like that. I must admit he maybe said it a tad better. Also, his sayings are used throughout our English language all these years later. They are used with such regularity that most people are unaware of it.
Now to the point. Let me see. The media said there is no voter fraud. Let’s just move on. The politicians echo the saying. They say that President Trump ought to admit defeat for the good of the country. (Nixon did that with Kennedy and look where that got him.)
Even well know republicans have joined the mantra. They say that it hinders the transfer of authority. Not just one, but it is a very large chorus and the words are repeated to the point that everyone ought to accept it as solid fact.
It seems few remember the 2000 election and Florida and the hanging chads. I don’t recall anyone saying how important it was to make a smooth transition. Maybe it wasn’t so important, being as the man going into The White House had an R after his name.
It does seem to be the ‘Rule.’ After all, few complained when Clinton refused to admit defeat. “I got more votes,” or something like that. The fact is that the dems are refusing to admit that defeat to this day. They get to complain without cause and the republicans don’t get to follow completely legal methods.
By the way, has anyone forgotten the words of Clinton prior to the election, “Don’t concede, no matter what.” I think POTUS has at least as much right to hang on as Biden does. Let’s say, the president won by 10 percent, both popular and Electoral College. Was Biden still supposed to refuse to concede?
Now, let’s get back to the protesting too much. I look around. I see all the protest against the legal processes by President Trump. Do you suppose that the protest is to keep ‘we the people’ from finding fraud and cheating?
Just maybe, had Nixon chose to look into all the dead people voting in Chicago, the democrats would have discovered cheating doesn’t pay. Then they would have ceased the efforts. If people would have gone to prison back then, we wouldn’t be dealing with the fraud today.
Now, we are supposed to ignore the fraud today and teach the dems that they can cheat any time and in any way. Sure. They will be able to do it right out in the open as the Soviets did.
In such a case, it would make the vote moot and we might as well all stay home and watch the TV. By then, the dems would also control the programming so that we would be spoon fed a bowl full of propaganda. Then, of course, there would be no rule of law.
Even if no fraud is proved, it will at least alert those who have thoughts of fraud. They might be less likely to try anything. More important, if we do find fraud, just maybe those who are behind it can find themselves to be guest of the Federal prison system. And, in spite of the fraud and cheating, the right man would remain it The White House.
The saying is frequently used and is just as true today as when it was first used…. There is none so blind as he who will not see. It would appear that about half this country is now blind, willfully.
Progression
- There was absolutely no voter fraud.
- Well, maybe there was a little fraud.
- There was not enough fraud to make any difference.
- Maybe there was enough fraud to overturn one state, but not the election.
- Well, possibility, there was enough to overturn the election, but Trump doesn’t deserve another term.
- Okay, they really muffed it, but it was all just a bunch of mistakes. No one did it on purpose.
There is an old saying around computers. I don’t know who first said it, but I suspect anyone who has been around computers any length of time knows it, “To err is human. To really mess things up it takes a computer.”
Certainly this election has proved the case. It would seem that there are more votes in some precincts than there are people, let alone qualified voters.
Fraud certainly is not new. Long before computers men were finding ways of cheating. After the Civil War, Black people were paid to vote 8 or 10 times. The Black man shouldn’t be blamed. He didn’t know any better.
You would think, after 200 years we’d start figuring out ways of keeping elections honest. The problem is that the democrats don’t want it to be honest. If they couldn’t cheat, how could they win?
Nonetheless, the voting machine has added a whole new dimension to cheating. The advantage of the computer is that it is fast. Hence, it allows the democrats to cheat much faster. Moreover, the computer leaves no paper trail. No matter how many times you do a recount, it always comes up the same. …another computer adage. GIGO (Garbage in, garbage out)
Apparently, that was not enough, because this time, they came up with the mail in ballot. This is where, if I find a ballot in the mail, even if it is not addressed to me, I can fill it out and send it in.
Apparently, there were many folks who did this. People, when they arrived physically at the pole, they said, you can’t vote. You already sent your ballot in. Now, how did that happen?
…and the story continues. Indeed, it might be the downfall of The United States. Abe Lincoln warned us of it. He said that if this nation will fall, it will be from within. It just might be that the warning turned to prophecy.
Oh, yes. One more thing. THE REPORTERS WERE IN CAHOOTS WITH THE DEMOCRATS RIGHT UP TO THEIR ELBOWS, OR MAYBE SHOULDER. It is ever conceivable that they were partially be hind it.
Voter Fraud
In my previous post, I suggested that all cases of fraud large or small should be prosecuted. I took a few seconds to look up the penalty of voter fraud on the Net. As near as I can figure, a person can be fined up to $500 and be imprisoned up to 2 years for each offense.
It doesn’t seem like much. I would prefer it to be more. As for one woman who was a social worker, she is likely wishing it were less. I just heard on the news she is being charged for 135 offenses. It is conceivable she could spend the rest of her life in prison.
As far as I am concerned, she should. Unfortunately, it will likely be less than 10 years, maybe less than 5. She is likely a democrat, which means she can break the law. She might get off with nothing more than a warning.
Much or Little
I keep hearing this thing, “There isn’t enough fraud that it effected the outcome of the election.”
SO WHAT!
Are we supposed to ignore the crime because he didn’t quite cheat enough? Are we supposed to give him a pass because he affected just one vote? In my opinion, anyone cheating during any election should be tossed in the hoosegow for a while or maybe a little longer.
…and by the way. Don’t try to convince me that Biden doesn’t know about it. He might not have instigated it. He might not be coordinating it. But he does know about it and he likely encouraged it.
Remember the Three Monkeys?
I hadn’t heard about them lately, but when I was younger, they were a common subject. One monkey covered its eyes and the caption under it was, “See no evil.” The second one covered its ears and the captions was, “Hear no evil.” The third one had its hands over its mouth with a caption of, “Speak no evil.”
The original concept has little to do with what I have to say today. Yet, it still applies. Obviously, if you have your eyes covered, you will see no evil. If you have your ears covered, in theory, you will hear no evil. Finally, if you keep your mouth covered, you will speak no evil.
The above is true whether or not it is good. For instance, the witness who covers his eyes cannot see the robbery, and hence he is no help to the police in finding the thief. Strangely, many witness act as the monkey with his eyes covered. When the policeman asks if he saw or heard anything, he assumes the position of the third monkey and clams up.
On the other hand, there are those who are intentionally blind. They close their eyes and ears to the crime that occurs right in front of them because they benefit, or they believe they will benefit from the crime.
Four F.I.S.A. false applications were submitted to the court and no one, but no one seems to know how it happened. It is sort of an extension of the three monkeys, “Read no evil.” Maybe we can say they were all doing there imitation of Sergeant Schultz in the old series, Hogan’s Heroes, “I see nothing. I see nothing.” I would guess that the whole of the seventh floor of the FBI is maned by hundreds of clones of Sergeant Schultz. The alternative thought is that they were a bunch of monkeys covering their eyes. You take your pick. Either way, by their own admission, they neither saw, heard or knew anything. I guess we must conclude that they covered their eyes for all four applications.
So now we are in the midst of a post election fog. The democrats have completely destroyed the faith the majority of us had in our election process and all the democrats can say is that they see no evidence of fraud. Of course they don’t. They are assuming the position of the monkey and they are covering their eyes. Guess what. If you close your eyes, cover them and look away, of course they see nothing. (There is no one so blind as those who will not see.)
Some say, there is very little fraud. That’s stupid. Are we supposed to ignore a crime because there is so little of it. Every person who commits fraud in an election should be prosecuted. Moreover, if a pattern develops, we must assume there is someone behind it.
If we find a broad pattern of it, as is now developing, it only stands to reason that the democrats are behind it. All those who disobeyed the law should be investigated and prosecuted, especially if they were sitting in a big luxurious office with his feet propped up at the time of the crime.
It just might help them and others see better during the next election. Of course, there is no need for Biden to do anything wrong. The country is full of people who gladly do it for him, possibly to the point of going to jail.
Lawyers!
It would seem the democrats already know they are going to lose this election, even with all their extra ballots. I say this because they seem to have all their lawyers getting ready to beg, barrow and steal every vote they need. (and maybe a few more)
It is why it is not enough to just beat them. It must be an overwhelming victory, one they will not be able to deny.
Can’t remember who said it or the exact wording… “He who counts the ballots wins the election.” I am sure the democrats have taken the saying to heart. They don’t care if it is dishonest. Since when did a little dishonesty get in their way. Everyone knows that Kennedy would have never been president had the dead not voted for him.
It is joked about to this day but it set a precedent that they learned from and follow to this day. Remember the hanging chads. Did not Mrs. Clinton tell Bidden not to concede, no matter what. Her implication was that the republicans were dishonest but but it was also a battle-cry to pull out all the stops, no matter how wrong it may be.
Remember. To them, it is all about control. Many of the democrats would be terrified of losing control of the land for four more years. They certainly do not want the control getting back into the hands of the people, the way that the current president wants it.
bfrhodes99 