Is History Repeating?

There are rumors to this day that President Wilson was unable to perform his duties in the final days of his presidency and his wife filled in for him. I don’t know, but it does sound plausible.

Some might even suggest old Joe isn’t up to the job and some puppeteer is operating Joe’s strings. Might it be his wife. Might it be Obama.

I don’t know, but I sure would like to see what he looks like away from his wife and staff for a while. Joe won’t be president for a few week but a few years. Moreover, very important decisions are being made. It would be nice to know who is making those decisions: his wife, Obama or some other unelected puppeteer.

The Hated

As I was looking for another quote, I came across this by George Orwell.

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”

If the above is true, and I believe it is, maybe it is a good thing to be hated by some people in some societies.

As for the quote I was looking, I have a slight vague recollection of it being about a crew that refuses to see the truth that they are about to sail on a ship infested with termites. I guess that skipper should have listened to that exterminator.

The truth is that this world is full of folks who hate the truth and refuse to listen, no matter how obvious it is,

Example: With today’s equipment, a doctor can easily determine the gender of a baby months before the birth. Then again, after he spends a few years in our government run schools….

Unmasking Masks

It would seem that, with exceptions, masks have become optional. Maybe, soon, they will be history.

It does not surprise me. If there was a reason to wear masks, they have had two years to prove it. No one did. On the contrary, I have heard reports of studies disproving their effectiveness.

I guess that was the reason for the judge’s ruling. I guess that is the reason the decision was not contested. I would suspect it won’t be long most of us will be maskless henceforth.

Next, hopefully, the mandatory vaccines will fade into obscurity. Then, maybe they will start allowing effective treatments. Seems to me that there are a few we already know of that work. There are even a couple inexpensive ones.

Joe Should Try Something New

So far , Joe has yet to own up to one of his many blunders. Something bad happens and Joe sticks his head up and looks around to see where he can affix the blame.

Maybe, perhaps, for a change he could try admitting his mistake.

Then again, this might be risky. People will wonder. Perhaps he’s an imposter. Maybe, someone is figuratively holding a gun on him. (It wouldn’t be a cannon. As he said, they are illegal. )

Incidentally , Joe can’t be a good leader. Good leaders own their mistakes. They don’t blame others. Now, it would seem others blame him. This is obvious from the more recent polls. It would seem he will leave a reputation of being an alibi Ike.

Best/Worst Choice

I used to doubt Joe’s intel. I used to doubt his ability to figure out the right choice. I would suspect that before he makes a choice, he spends hours, maybe days figuring things. Then when he knows which thing is right, he turns and does the exact opposite.

It might seem a farfetched idea but think of it. Givin a true false test, the law of averages say we can get half or near half of them right by guessing. So, the only way he can get it wrong 100% of the time is if he knows all the right choices. …and then Joe blames everyone but the man in the moon. He might still do that.

Worthless Laws

A number of years ago, we, as a nation made it illegal to make or drink alcoholic beverages. That did not work out so well. The fact of the matter is, it caused far more problems than it fixed. Moreover, the only ones that stopped drinking were those who obeyed the law. The rest, those who had little or no regard for the law kept drinking.

To make matters worse, the criminal element started making money from the law. Some made the alcohol. Some smuggled it, in some cases in rowboats. Guess what, those guys with the little boats ended up making a fortune. It seemed they could still make the stuff in Canada, but only for export. In other words, the Canadians were making a bundle of money off the law, and I am sure it was not by accident.

It was a well-meaning law. If they had managed to dry up the country, it likely would have done a lot of good. However, good or bad, the law was worthless.

And now Joe wants to pass another useless law. He wants to outlaw ghost guns. Certainly, it is well-meaning, just as prohibition. However, it is just as useless; maybe less. Nowadays, we have the internet. Anyone who knows how to surf the web and has a few machinic skills can quickly start making guns in his basement, just as those who made gin in bathtubs.

Moreover, there is nothing stopping people from making them in Canada, Mexico or South America and smuggling them, maybe in rowboats or sailboats. I don’t think I am suggesting anything new. Indeed, there are likely those waiting for the opportunity. Then they can make their money off the ghost gun law just as effectively as the mobs made their money off the booze.

I do have two real suggestions that just might work better than the useless laws. First, and most important, enforce the laws they currently have. May I remind one and all, this means those who murder with or without guns. You might note, some have used hammers or baseball bats.

Secondly, don’t make it so hard to buy and use guns in self-defense.

It is not a perfect solution. Nothing ever is. However, making guns illegal is going to only ensure that us regular citizens will have no defense when those who do have guns show up in our Living rooms uninvited.

Incidentally, do we really want to spend all our tax dollars trying to enforce a worthless law?

Just Change the Channel

Whenever people complained about TV adult programming, the argument they constantly heard was, “Just change the channel.” Or of course there was, “Your TV does have and off switch, right?”

I never did buy into any of it. I have my reasons, which I made known in the past and will make known in the future. However, my ire is aimed in a different direction today.

When the schools start teaching adult subjects to the third and fourth graders; when the subject for the day for first graders are private body parts, just how is it that we switch the channels? Just how is it that we turn it off?

Worse yet, frequently the schools hide such things from us? Just what do we do when Gov.ED decides we don’t know how to raise our kids and take them from us?

It is yet another attack on the American families. It is yet another attack on the American way of life. It is yet another attempt by the socialists to take over. To be sure, God will deal with these genuine creeps. However, look at the damage they will do in the meantime.

The Irony of it All

The dems are cheering the new justice. They are celebrating they managed to slip her in. Maybe they are really proud of themselves. The truth is they had no gains. The court has the same makeup as before. However. as for me I feel a little uneasy that we now have a woman on the most powerful court of the land that does not know what a woman is, this though she has two children. Can someone tell me how this can happen?

Does this now mean we are going to have to add an amendment to define men and women. It is cinch that or forefathers knew the definitions. I am sure that had they realized that the question might come up, the definition would have been part of the constitution.

As with most of the people in this world, most feel a need for a definition as ridiculous. It would seem that only the dems in this country are really dumb enough that it has to be spelled out for them.

Biden’s One Very Smart Decision

Right out of the gate, Joe made one very bad decision after the next. Among the many other things, he opened the border and closed shut down the oil industry. However, maybe his smartest decision was made before he took office.

At the time I thought it was dumb, but the more I think it over, it was wise. By selecting Kamala Harris as his running mate, he insured that they would make him immune to the 25th amendment. No one in their right mind would want Kamala in the oval office. Can you imagine listing to her cackle most every day.

So, at least for the first two years, he’s safe. On the other hand, with a republican speaker, it is plausible to talk them both into resigning. Then, we would have a republican congress and president.

It is not impossible. The dems came very close when they attacked Agnew and then Nixon. Before the middle of his second term, we had a man in the oval office that was not elected. They might not have put a dem in office, but it was the next thing to it. Being as he was not elected, he had little or no mandate.

If the dems can do it, why can’t the republicans?

Is the Self-Defense Really Settled?

I’m not even sure how log ago it was when a young man successfully defended himself. We know it was self-defense because it was settled in court. …or was it?

In the first place, it will never be the same for Rittenhouse? It has changed his life forever. Those who he encounters will always look at him differently.

To be sure, people will always look at self-defense differently. Rittenhouse acted legally. It was clear from the start the prosecuting attorneys tried to make an example of the man, instead of trying to make examples of those who were rioting that night.

I had considered getting a gun to protect my home after an armed break in. I looked through the internet and found some enlightening things. Maybe Rittenhouse would have done things differently had he done the same, not that I am suggesting he did anything wrong.

It just is that we live in a world that is often times upside down. If you shoot an armed intruder, you just might be charged regardless of how right you are. It depends very much on the prosecutor, as in Rittenhouse’s case. If you look through the internet a while, you will see what I mean.

I found one remark especially thoughtful. Loosely he wrote, Shoot a man charging at you twice in the chest, you will likely be OK. If he keeps coming at you and you shoot him again… this time between the eyes… it is no longer self-defense but execution, which, by the way is not legal.

It tells me you might be better off using a shotgun. I don’t much like the idea, but the prosecutors just might be pushing us into it. Most often, if you shoot someone in the middle of the chest with a 12 gauge, he’s going to stop in his tracks regardless of what kind of drugs are in his circulatory system. It does have another advantage. Most people in their right mind, when they see the shot gun, will decide there was somewhere else they needed to be.

Nonetheless, I write this to warn you all. It might be legal to shoot that gun in self-defense. However, in many cases you will need to go to court to prove it was self-defense. It is a good idea to remember that many prosecutors are FOCs (Friends of the Criminals)

Just a word to wise. I am sure, at this point, Rittenhouse would concur with this advice.