Mandates and Laws

  1. Vaccine mandates might work if the vaccinatins were effective.
  2. Mask mandates might work if and when masks work.
  3. Laws only work when they are enforced.
  4. Borders are only borders when they are properly guarded according to the immigration laws.
  5. Biden will only start obeying the law when we the people demand it. Until then, he will do as he wants. Currently, he has no fear of the law, the Constitution or the courts. He said he could not get away with mandates, then he issued mandates. The court demanded he reiinstate hold in Mexico and he ignored the order.

Because vaccines are ineffectve, the vaccine mandates are useless.

Because the laws are not enforced, we effectively live in a lawless land.

Because he ignores the law Biden is a criminal.

It Would Seem That Some Consider Crime a Laughing Matter

Recently, when Biden’s press rep., Psaki was asked about crime, she first laughed at the question about Biden being soft on crime. Then, she plead ignorant when she said she did not understand the question. She said she did not understand the “soft on crime” thing.

Just in case she does not read this, just in case someone does read this who can speak to Psaki, this is a quick rundown on the meaning.

  1. The border
    1. He helped and encouraged over a million people to break our immigration laws. To be sure he has invited them, provided help for them on arrival and provided transportation to the city of their choice… all illegal.
    2. He has assisted in the human trafficking, including prostitution, slave labor and to a lessor degree, murder. There is more than one body that has turned up near the border…both sides.
    3. He has assisted in smuggling of drugs and guns.
    4. He has assisted in helping known felons to return to the US, permitting them to continue their killing sprees.
    5. He has permitted foreign agents to infiltrate our country, making it easy for them to cause harm by murder and sabotage.
  2. Encouraging the refunding of police. (His word, reallocate. Same same.)
  3. Using no-justice department to go after conservatives and parents improperly while ignoring the crimes by dems. (Incidentally, where are those swift trials for those held for Jan 6. It has been over a year and I haven’t seen even one trial start. Many have been held without being charged.)
  4. Then too, what happened to all those in the no-justice department that have dreamed up all those false charges about “Russia, Russia, Russia. These people presented false documents and I haven’t seen so much as one of them receive a slap on the hand. That is why I call it the no-justice department.

To be sure, none of this is anything to laugh about. However, it would seem some think it is funny.

One more important thing. As the pressure has built, they are suggesting we use federal funds for the police. Bad idea. They were de-funded locally. The funding should be re-established at the local level. I don’t like the idea of federal funds getting into local law enforcement. Too many strings attached to federal money.

Also, the funding is just a small part of it. We need to straighten out the bond system and the district attorneys. Finally, respect and local support needs to be reestablished. The federal government has no power over this other than to provide the proper encouragement. They helped to destroy the local systems. They should help to straighten them out.

Allegiance

It is the third word in the pledge of allegiance that I learned when I was four, sixty eight years ago. At the time, I had no idea what it meant. After all these years, nine in the Marines, I have a pretty good idea of its meaning, maybe more than most.

It is a word taken for granted. Many don’t ever take the time or effort to truly understand what it means. as they recite the words, they say them by rote, they pay little attention to them. Until recently, almost all legally new citizens know the meaning of the word, mostly because of what they left behind. However, more and more frequently, naturalized citizens pay their allegiance to two flags. They never truly let go of the one that represents the nation they left.

Most have no problem with that, but it irritates me when I see the Flag of a foreign county flying in this country. We speak of those special men who fought to secure our liberty and freedom during World War II. I assure you, most of them would not like to see a foreign flag flying in our country, especially when those flying it have so much disdain for Old Glory. If they like this country so much, why do they insist on hanging on to what they left behind? If they like what they left behind, why do they come here?

To be sure, most will tell you it is money, although they say it is for a good job. And so it is that we purchase their allegiance for the price of a 9 to 5 job. You take the job away and they will head south just as fast as they can. It is all about the money.

Some have seen fit to give these people the right to vote, not because they deserve it but because of the increased chances of gaining office. So they want those who have absolutely no allegiance to vote them into office. It makes me doubt the true allegiance of the office seeker. Do they seek office to do us good or do they seek office for the power and glitter.

Me. It turns my stomach to see such things even suggested. For me, to vote should call for total allegiance to city, county, state and country. Anything less is a distortion of the vote and I assure you those that fought in Europe or the South Pacific would find the odor pungent and nauseating. Moreover, it speaks loudly of the candidate’s allegiance. If they aren’t aware of it, someone should explain it to them.

Besides, do we want those who are proud of the Russian or Chinese flag voting in our elections. Such is preposterous on its face. It should never be considered for a second.

Priorities

The Chinese are trying to become the most powerful country.

North Korea is trying to develop weapons with which they can destroy most of the world.

Iran is trying to destroy Israel and then the U.S.

Putin is trying to re-establish the Soviet Union.

… and what is the most important thing to Joe? Global climate. If I were in a place to speak to the man, I would explain that if any combination of the above happens, global climate will be the least of our problems. Then again, I’m not even sure it will do any good to draw pictures for the man. He very likely doesn’t understand. If he can, he doesn’t care. Power and control is his goal as well as those around him. It is not just their highest priority. It is their only priority.

The Dem’s Tightrope

The Dem’s, aka friends of the criminals, need to take care. They keep putting pressure on a couple of their own in hopes of ridding the Senate of the filibuster. They walk a dangerous tightrope. If they apply too much pressure, they could lose one or two senators from their ranks. Even if they lose one, they stand in danger of losing their 50 majority. This is true even should they become independent. They would only have 49 (maybe 48) senators while the Republicans would have 50. That would mean the majority would possibly go to the Republicans.

I am sure that most realize what that means. However, I am especially sure that Fauci knows. If such a thing happens, he will likely buy a ticket to China. If he doesn’t he will wish he did. It is quite possible, maybe plausible that he will face committee meetings that world will find out his part in the pandemic. China will be the only nation on earth where he might be safe after that. Then again, he might not be safe there either.

As an aside, it is also conceivable that those senator(s) just might be joined by other senators who will be clinging to the seats. This might be followed by a few representatives jumping the proverbial ship. Ol’ Nancy can’t afford much of that. The next thing she knows, she might lose her gavel before the mid-terms.

As an aside to the aside, the occupier and the vice occupier will not like that… not at all. Neither will the squad.

What is the Relief

I tried looking up the legal term but I am no lawyer. I am open to suggestions. The problem is that old Joe knew noway was it legal to make everyone take that vaccine but he decided to do it anyway.

While The Supreme Court put a stop to it, there were damages done and those damages should have justice. People lost their jobs from the simple threat of huge fines for businesses and corporations. Most everyone knew the edict from on high would not succeed, but yet, in a way it did. The mere threat was enough to cause irreversible damages.

Did we hear those behind the edict say, “Oops, sorry.” Of course not. There was no apology because it worked exactly the way they wanted it to. However, he hoped that the Court would give his proclamation a few more weeks to do its damage. A few more weeks delay surly would have been devastating. It was an illegal law given by a lawless occupier of the Oval Office.

Now, where do all the businesses go to recover their losses? What happens to those who were brave enough to stick up for their rights? Joe says he is for women. Yet where is the compensation for those who were pregnant and were afraid to take the shot. Then too, what about those who had genuine religious reasons for rejecting the vaccine?

I guess the term relief is not proper in this case, yet, I am sure those whose lives were disrupted know very well what I mean. No one will need to explain it to them.

Moreover, as I mentioned before, I disagree with anyone who permits the requirement of demanding experimental vaccine, especially when it has proved so useless for youth; especially when it has proved so harmful; especially when there are so many effective meds we have that will treat the disease so quickly and reliably.

The of course, old Joe just has to have his edicts. Otherwise, how would he and his cohorts control us. Then again, is he even aware of the damage he has done.

For my side note: May those who cheated on the election to put Joe into office find justice for their deeds. And may Fauci live for a thousand years… in some prison cell to pay for the pain he has brought on this world.

An Unusual Concept

I can’t say I totally agreed with the Supreme Court today. I don’t believe anyone should be able to require another to take a vaccine that is still classified as experimental.

Nonetheless, putting that aside, it would appear that the president can now require Supreme Court justices to take experimental vaccines, whether or not they want to take it. The justices are, after all, federal employees. The thought did not occur to me until after their decision. I wonder if it occurred to those wearing black robes.

There Are People Dying!

Joe Biden lost his son. I am sure he took it very hard. I know I would if I lost one of my sons.

Nonetheless, there are thousands dying around him and he seems oblivious to it.

Over 100,000 have died from opioids sense he has taken the helm

Hundreds have died on their way to our border; others die north of the border; others are sold into who knows what all. Some of them die too, or they wish they would die.

Thousands die because they cannot receive proper care of the China virus, and he knows there are many low cost cures available.

Joe is guilty of nothing less than mass murder and he simply cares not at all, and he never will.

1>574

I know it seems odd that I would suggest that one is greater than five hundred seventy-four, but it would seem to be true. After 574 riots, which resulted in deaths and over a billion dollars in damages, there was absolutely no desire for investigation. On the other hand, a few people go in and wonder about the Capital and we need an immediate Congressional investigation. And, by the way, before the investigation is truly begun, we find that it was as bad as the attack on Pearl Harbor and the one on the the trade center.

The concept is as believable as 1 being greater than 574. However it does show where the FOCS are.

Equivalence ?

In the last part of 8th grade math, I began learning about algebra. I learned about expressions and factors. I learned about constants, variables and rules on how to work with it all. Finally, I learned about equations.

On 9/11, along with unknown other millions, I saw two big jet planes fly into two huge buildings. After, while still watching, I could hear faint thuds coming from the TV. In a while they explained that it was the sound of people hitting the ground. They jumped knowing they would die. They preferred it over the fire.

A short time later, I saw those buildings collapse.

Now, Kamala wants us to put an equal sign between 9/11 and 1/6, the break in of Capital Building. No equal sign should ever be between the two events. Anyone trying to assign such an equivalence needs her head examined.

Let me correct that. There’s no need for an examination. She is already certifiable. I think most of us are well aware of it.

By the way, as usual, I have a side note. It would seem Nancy Pelosi wants to investigate 1/6, just not too closely. Certainly not her part in securing the premises. She did not want the security and certainly doesn’t want it becoming common knowledge. Could it be that she expected it. If so, she must have been behind it. Just a wild guess. Yet, who can prove me wrong? Nancy won’t release the documents that would prove me wrong.

Moreover, Nancy and her cohorts have taken maximum advantage of the entire thing.