Author Archives: bfrhodes99

Killing Grandma

Posted in Abuse of Power, Uncategorized by

Many moons ago, the dummycrats made a commercial depicting the Republicans killing Grandma by pushing her over a cliff.  By the way, the depiction was horribly wrong.

Now, the governor of New York literally does kill Grandma, and Grandpa (by the hundreds, maybe thousands of them) He did it by putting people infected with the China virus in nursing homes.

It sort of reminds me of the first possible case of biological warfare.  It seems they catapulted bodies over the walls of the castle in order to give those inside the black plague.  I don’t know if the story is true.  I’m understand that it has not been proven.

Now oddly, the governor just has them driven up to the door and forces the nursing home to take them.  No catapults required.  Then, of course, no one in the dummycrat party says a thing, certainly not the dummycrat media.  Not one of them confronts the murderer, not once.  It does sound a little one sided to me, but then what do I know?  I’m not the one with the law degree.

Guess some folks are above the law.  Guess some folks can do whatever they want… as long as he has a D after his name.

For Those Interested

Posted in Abuse of Power, Dummycrats, Uncategorized by

Choke holds could have been outlawed a long time ago.  Washington state and/or Seattle could have made them illegal at any time.  However, the dummycrats have controlled the state and city for many decades.  Must everything be fixed at the federal level?  Can’t the dummycrats fix anything?  Guess not.  They just wait until something goes wrong and then blame the president.  That way, they can use it as an issue in the election.

Orders From the Top

Posted in Lt. Gen. Flynn, Obama, Our Legal Systems, President Trump, Uncategorized by

For three years now, there have been strong suspicions that orders to spy on the Trump campaign and to frame Gen. Flynn came from the top… Obama himself.  Recent notes have been released that establish it as fact.

The dummycrats have decided to ignore it, surprise, surprise.  Wonder why.

I assure you, had it come out the other way, the mainstream media would have made it the headline of the day.  Now, I wonder just who they are rooting for.

At any rate, it establishes 3 things.  The Trump campaign was spied on.  Obama, himself, was behind it.  Not only is General Flynn not guilty, but innocent.  All doubt has been removed.

And by the way, Bidden was also in on the frame.  He’s guilty of  it right up to his elbows, maybe more  And yet, the dummycrats selected him as their candidate for president.  (And still some wonder wonder why I call them dummycrats.)

“Crazy Nuts”

Posted in Crazy Nuts, Dummycrats, unbelievable, Uncategorized by

“Crazy Nuts” is the title of one of my books.  The title comes from the main character, Kathy.  In the book, she explains that her mother wouldn’t let her call people stupid.  She was told it was impolite and it didn’t sound nice.  So she starts using the word crazy instead.  Then, if something is really stupid, she calls it crazy nuts.

The reason this was brought to mind was a news story I just heard to change the name of Columbus, Ohio to Flavortown.  Now that is not just crazy.  That is crazy nuts and I defy anyone to deny it.

Should you decide you would like to read “Crazy Nuts” or any of my books, please go to my author’s page at:

http://www.amazon.com/author/story_teller

You can sample any of them on Kindle or by just clicking on the book.  (Amazon’s idea and I think it is a good one)

http://www.amazon.com/author/story_teller

http://www.amazon.com/author/story_teller

http://www.amazon.com/author/story_teller

http://www.amazon.com/author/story_teller

How Sad It Is

Posted in Abuse of Power, Politcal Opinion, President Trump, Uncategorized by

How sad it is to find the enemy among us… those who pretend to be for America but are really never-Trumpers.  It is worse than walking among snakes.  It makes a person wonder who will rise from among the ranks and bite next.

First there is one selected to be a Supreme Court Justice.  Then there is one selected to be Security Advisor.  They now show their real colors but too late.  One can never be removed from office, the other has already done his damage.

Even worse, it is a tragedy to see politics take such a strong foothold in the highest court in the land.  If one cannot find justice at the Supreme Court, then there is no justice.

Experience

Posted in Abuse of Power, Dummycrats, experience, law enforcement, Lawyers and Representation, Uncategorized by

Without a doubt, we can say that the wise person learns from his experience.  However, as for me, I like to profit from the experience of others.  Mostly, it costs me less.  Then again, maybe I am wrong.  After all, I am hardly one to give advice.  I am basically living off my Social Security at 72.  (Some retirement)

Nonetheless, I have no bills other than insurance, utilities and taxes.  Unless some unforeseen disaster comes along, I’ll do just fine.

Then I look at all these cities governments that want to do away with their police.  OK.  Fine.  I don’t think it is such a good idea but if that’s what they really want, it is their decision to live with.  Even so, I suggest they hold off for a month or two.  When the other cities meet with disaster, then the cities that hold back will be able to learn from the mistakes of the others.

On the other hand, if your city officials launch right out and do away with the police right away, then the other cities will learn your mistake and so will you.  Then, all the police you did have will be gone and reorganizing a new department will take far too long, not to mention the time it will take to replace all the police officers.

By the way, in this case, the cost of the experience might be more than money.  It will very likely cost lives as well: black, brown and white.  It will likely hit the blacks worst of all.  That would make the lesson very expensive for you and even more for your constituents.  Then again, I have been wrong a time or two.  It just might cost you far more than you would ever have ever thought.

Then, we all will be able to file this under dumb ideas.  The tragedy is that still won’t learn.  It is the nature of dummycrats.  They keep trying the same old things and expecting something different.  The fact is, there are some folks who are bad and need to be locked up, for their good as well as society.  To do this, we need police, district attorneys and courts.  Without them, even some honest people break the law.

Unplanned Results

Posted in Communism, Uncategorized by

Just because you don’t intend to help the communists, that doesn’t mean you aren’t.  The communists, the Russians and the Chinese love the riots.  The rioters do all the damage that the communists would do if they could, but can’t.  So they just stand by and watch.

Actually that’s not true.  The commies cheer and, whenever they get a chance, they provide a little help.  Why not.  The rioters are helping them.  They would be stupid if they didn’t take advantage of the situation.  By the way, they are not stupid.

Nothing would make them happier than for the rioters to bring down our government.  Then, to take over, all they need to do is step in and take the reins.

I would really like to tell the rioters that but for two things.  First, they wouldn’t understand.  Second, they wouldn’t care.  Third, they would likely become angry.

Then one day when they wake up under a government like that in China, they will wonder what happened.  They will care then but it will be far too late.  Oh! …and by the way, communists regimes don’t permit riots.  Actually, they don’t even permit demonstrations.  Their definition of free speech is when you say what they want.  Anything else and you will get more than a hand slap.  Likely, you will get more than a day or two in jail. Then it won’t much matter what the people want.  It is a feudal state by another name, but worse.

The Facts

Posted in Deceit, Dummycrats, Important things, Lawyers and Representation, Uncategorized by

Fact 1: People who steal are thieves.

Fact 2: People who needlessly burn down businesses are arsonists.

Fact 3: After all is said and done, hundreds, perhaps thousands of businesses will never return.  Some will move; some will simply fail.

Fact 4: The values of the properties in the areas will be depressed for decades.

Fact 5: The only people who will gain from the riots are the instigators.  Those who live in the area will suffer.  To be sure some will leave.  Some will have to settle for lesser jobs or no job at all.

Fact 6: Those who will suffer the most are the minorities, especially the African-Americans.  They will be the ones who will live in the depressed neighborhoods.  By the way, many of the merchants who will lose their businesses are African-American.

Question: Where is the justice for those who will lose their businesses and/or homes?  I know it is a dumb question.  Everyone knows that they will receive no justice.

The fact is… the whole idea of rioting was and is a bad idea.  The fact is, every one of the cities where there were riots were run by dummycrats.  How is that working out for the minorities?

Open Question for One and All

Posted in Dummycrats, Lawyers and Representation, Obama, Politcal Opinion, Respect by

Former UN Ambassador under Obama (Samantha Power) requested the unmasking of several people (around 7 if memory serves me properly) who were in the Trump campaign.  My question is simple, Why?  What purpose did it serve?  Certainly, it can’t have had anything to do with Russia.

I cannot imagine that her job would involve any need to unmask anyone.

For me, it would seem to shoot a hole in their logic that all the unmasking was justified.

I mean Samantha Power, seems a nice woman.  Of all those on the Obama administration, she seemed to me the least objectionable.  So far, I have no idea who she unmasked and, of course, I have no idea why.

Naturally, I don’t have a list of duties for the position, but, as near as I can tell, she was not much more than a mouth piece for Obama and, hopefully, the United States.  So, if anyone can give me a reason that she had for unmasking anyone, please let me know.

Personally, I have about come to the conclusion that all permission for unmasking should require the president’s explicit signature.  That way, he would not be given that wonderful “plausible deniability” that Obama has relied on.  It would seem every time someone asks him about any of it, he claims he had no knowledge of it.  Either he is lying or his staff kept a lot of secrets from him.

Moreover, it displayed how little the Obama crew respected the law and the incoming administration.

Don’t You Just Love Lawyers?

Posted in Lawyers and Representation, Uncategorized by

I saw a commercial the other day that floored me.  The lawyer said that we should never feel bad for the other driver.  The other guy’s insurance will pay, not the other driver.  If the other guy doesn’t have insurance we won’t sue him.

Dah!

Now that makes sense.  The lawyer just might be rather smart but, clearly, he thinks I’m dumb.  Just what kind of lawyer will go after someone who has no means of paying the judgment?

The truth of the matter is that there is one thing that the lawyer is interested in, his forty percent.  Therefore, he will only sue someone with money or someone with insurance.  It would be stupid to go after someone who has no way to pay.  If he did, then even if he won, he would still lose.  He would be out the time and legal expenses.  …and his forty percent of nothing would still be nothing.

I have nothing to back it up with, but my best guess is that one of the biggest causes of the increase in insurance are lawyers.  Indeed, if you take the lawyers out of the settlements, the cost of insurance would likely decrease by a third, maybe more.

Certainly, this is true about auto insurance, but maybe even truer in other things as well.  Consider the doctor.  He must carry insurance to cover all suits, especially those that have no basis.  Most suits are settled to prevent the larger court costs.  The doctor says, “I didn’t do anything wrong.”

His insurance company says “It doesn’t matter.  Settle or you are on your own.”

It happens every day.  The doctor does nothing wrong and the lawyer walks off with 10 or 20-thousand dollars.  In most cases, the lawyer knows he has no case but he sues anyway, knowing the doctor will settle.

Do you think this doesn’t affect you?  Think again.  A big part of those doctor’s fees goes to pay the malpractice insurance.  Every time you pay a doctor, or the health insurance premium, some of it goes to those lawyers.

Every time you buy a somewhat dangerous product like a lawnmower or even a toaster, some of what you pay is going to go to line the pockets of those lawyers.  Every time you buy medicine, guess what.  Pharmacies must pay for insurance too.  Sometimes, they don’t have enough insurance and they go bankrupt paying the judgments.

Lawyers continually go in search of prey, just as a tiger shark.  Then, when they find it, you see the ad on the TV the next day.  They dare not delay.  They know if they do, some other lawyer will beat them to the pay dirt.

On the other side of the coin, some companies knowingly do things wrong.  Well, actually it isn’t the company.  It is some person or persons within the company.  So, the big corporation goes bankrupt and all the employees are without jobs.  Meanwhile, the character who truly caused the problem retires with a million-dollar golden parachute.  The only people who walk away unscathed are the lawyers, both sides, and the culprit who took the short cut to save a dime or two in the manufacturing process.

By the way, the public loses too.  The product that was being made was a good one.  Now we must do without it.  Don’t you just love lawyers?

By the way, the main reason it works this way is that it is mainly lawyers who write the laws.  They write the laws to benefit the laws, not the folks like you and me.