Friend or Foe

You notice the pattern? Whenever the the dems want to specify a person as a foe, they call him a Nazi, a Hitler, or some other German foe. It is the way they find convenient for dehumanizing the enemy. Trump is just the last of a list of people that they have decided make into the enemy. The first one I know of was the first Bush, the one that was a WWII hero. He hardly fits the bill of a Nazi. Since then, as far as I know, all the Republican nominees have been given the tag, which none of them deserved. Certainly Trump does not deserve the term. The fact of the matter is, if you look up the term Nazi, you will find that it is for a type of socialists. You know, where the government owns everything and runs all business.

Sort of sounds like communism, doesn’t it. It should. They are very close of kin. The differences are minute. However, the big difference is that the head of the Nazis was Hitler. Since, then, there have been others who have tried to take control of the Nazis, though no one has ever really managed to gain control as Hitler did.

During the time that Hitler was coming to power, the communists had already established themselves in Russia and they were spreading their tentacles on into Europe and somewhat into the US. You see, as with the Nazis, the communists sought power.

Hitler interrupted their process. He virtually destroyed the communists power in Europe. Being power hungry as socialists are, they started trying to expand their empire, throughout Europe and into England. On the other hand, there are many who believe that the communists had made inroads into the US. Many believed; and even accused President Roosevelt as being communist. I don’t guess we will ever know for sure, but he certainly helped them gain power in this country as well as aided them gain control of Russia.

The facts I’ve presented are undeniable. Argue them as you want, but if you go to the older history books, you will find them true.

So, When the second world war broke out, we had a socialist government in England, Germany and the US, as well as Russia. However, the Russians were called communists, the British they called socialists and and in the US, we called them Democrats. Also, you notice that the US did not get into the war until after Germany attacked Russia.

Deny it as you like, but, during the presidency of Roosevelt, the socialists, indeed the communists made more strides into control of our schools and government than ever before. Moreover, those strides became ingrained and there was no removing them.

I could go on and on. I do have the information and I can provide the proof. However, it has become something of a friend or foe thing. Whenever a socialists is in the Whitehouse, then he is considered a friend. Whenever a Republican is in the Whitehouse, he is considered a foe by the dems and the news media. Moreover, the first time a republican digs in and refused to give the communists their way, then the names come out instantly, Nazi, Hitler and so forth. “Why can’t those Republican compromise a little?” It has become a habit. Nazis are socialists. Trump is a capitalist, not a Nazi, not a socialists.

The way they figure it, anyone that isn’t a socialists is Nazi, which just isn’t so. Trump is neither a Nazi nor a foe. He is a friend who will make things better, that is if the socialists would stop trying to put him in prison.

Oh, and by the way, I noticed, they never do call Trump a communists or a socialists. That would be associating him with their friends, their heroes like Lenin and Stalin. No matter what else, you will never hear a dem degrade the their two heroes.

On Goodman Road, the Limit is 45 in Most of Southaven

My question is, why do most people remain close to or below that speed. Well, I know one reason I do. I know that if I go faster, one of those fine law enforcement officers will pull me over, we will have a short nice conversation, and give me a little piece of paper. If I exceed 45 by too much, he just might take me out of my car and put the cuffs on me and rightfully so.

I won’t like it. I would much prefer to drive at 55. I would much prefer that those wonderful peace officers would just look the other way. However, I do understand that there is a point to it. I might think I can drive safely at 55. However, the authorities have decided to set the limit at 45.

Even then, if I drive at 45 when I should slow to 30, that nice policeman might still pull me over. Yeah. There always around to spoil things aren’t they.

Now, just for a moment, let’s imagine that we decided to do as the dems suggested and we defunded the police. There would no longer be anyone around to stop me. So, law or not, I would be able to drive at 55. Others might do 60. Things could get dangerous, quickly.

It is why they made the laws in the first place and it is why they gave officers the authority to enforce them. It is as I have said many times before, a law that is not enforced is useless. It is worse than no law at all.

Oddly, most people know all this, though they like to pretend they don’t.

For instance, it is illegal for illegal aliens to vote. Yet there is no mechanism to enforce this law in many democrat states. They do not need to produce any form of ID. They are encouraged to register to vote when they get a driver’s license and they are encouraged to get driver’s license, without proof of citizenship. I dare say, in many states, their law enforcement is told to look the other way. If a policeman were to arrest an alien for voting, he’d likely get his hand slapped, figuratively of course. Indeed the office might be asked, “What did you do that for?” Then he’d be told, “Don’t do that!”

And that is how illegal aliens vote. That is how they are encouraged to vote. The law by itself, will never stop the law breaker. It requires many means of law enforcement.

Strange how most of the dems try to make us ignore that part of it.

The Truth Is In the Lies

As the people went in to rescue and provide supplies to the folks in Georgia and the Carolinas, the accusations flew this way and that. They couldn’t all be telling the truth as they were contrary to the reports of FEMA.

I have already said which side I believe. It was based on the history of the years of lies told by the dems. I mean, I couldn’t believe what they said before. Why in the world should I believe them now.

Alright. Let’s just say for the sake of argument, I don’t know who is telling the truth. Let us say I don’t know for a fact that it took a week for the gov to do one thing to help out.

And so it was I watched the news on CBS last night. They were interviewing an official, a really high up guy in FEMA. The guy from FEMA rebuked the so-called lies told by those that actually did go in and rescued the folks and flew supplies in. The interviewer, who actually didn’t interview, but was busy helping the guy from FEMA disparage the real heroes.

After close to 5 minutes of their taking turns running down the brave and selfless folks who really helped, the interviewer asked, “So how do the victims request your help.”

Very calmly, very matter of fact, the official gave out the web page info where they could ask for help. And in that, he has exposed the lie. You see, the victims, the large majority of the real victims have no access to power, let alone the internet. Don’t you think it would be far better if they sent people into the area and looked for victims, sort of like the real heroes did. I never heard of any of them put up web sites for the victims, only in and effort to get others to help.

Me. I am inclined to believe the truth. While Old Joe sat on the beach, Trump was spending his own money, using his his own resources to provide real help, that is as much as he could. While Kamala was seeking campaign funds in California, helicopter pilots were using their own helicopters and paying for their own fuel to move supplies in that they paid for out of their own pockets and flying victims out of danger. While FEMA was thinking about it, hundreds of people were busy trying to mobilize people, asking for help.

They say, in the event of disaster, we should be able to self sustain for at least 3 days. Newsbreak, folks. It was a week before FEMA had anyone on site. It was almost 2 weeks before orders were made for the military to help, though there were several bases, so-to-speak, right over the hill.

And of course, if the victims are going to seek help from any of FEMA, they must first find a working computer and somehow hook it up to the internet. Now, why in the world didn’t all those who raced in there think of that. It would have been much faster and it wouldn’t have cost nearly as much.

Think about it, If they those heroes were going to lie, why would they spend their fortunes in doing it? On the other hand, it didn’t cost the officials of FEMA a penny to spread their falsehoods.

,Which We Knew Before

When Kamala was running against Old Joe, quickly the nation decided that Kamala was far worse than Joe. She never even truly got a start. The Kamala became VP. Then the dems decided that Old Joe wasn’t going to win. So, in panic, they put Kamala in there. Who knows if that is even legal, let alone right.

Now, they have started letting Kamala out of the basement. She is permitted to speak. And now that she is speaking again, we know that which we knew before. Kamala is worse than Joe and it would appear she is out to prove it again.

Their only hope now of winning is simple. Destroy the orange man some how some way. Did you happen to notice that all of a sudden, the attacks on Trump have increased quickly and drastically. Did you notice the new book released in time to effect the election, but not soon enough to allow Trump to counter it.

They, the dems, started the ide of early voting. They knew it would give them the 4 or 5 points they needed to win the elections. Now, maybe they are wishing they could stop it. With all the early voting, they have even less time to convince the nation that that Trump is a monster.

The Battle of Redefinitions

You are welcome to look it up. US title 8 code 1101 defines an alien as a person who is not a citizen of the the united states. By inference, a person who is an alien and is in the US illegally is an illegal alien. However, the dems define them as immigrants.

By simply changing the definition from alien to immigrant their argument is half won??? Their logic, immigrants are good, even if aliens are bad. Ironically, the term alien is used to define immigrant. That is to say, an immigrant is also an alien. Sorry dems. aliens who are illegal immigrate are still aliens who are in the US illegally… hence, illegal alien.

As the bard said, the rose is still the rose, even if called a flower. Regardless of any of the above, the person who is not a citizen in this country illegally is still an illegal alien.

On the other hand, the unborn child in a short time is a son or daughter. He is someone’s niece or nephew. When you look at that for three or four years he or she is your son or daughter, can you really imagine taking your three year old son’s life, only three years earlier.

The dems call it abortion. Regardless, it is a death.

When soldiers go into battle, they prefer to call the enemy anything but human. However, they are still human. This was never more aptly illustrated when they stopped the first world war long enough to celebrate Christmas, enemies all. For just about a day, they were humans were on both sides of that battle front. Then, suddenly they were the no good enemy again.

Redefinitions are dangerous. We need to see babies for what they are. On the other hand, we need to see an illegal aliens for what they are. When we don’t, we are very apt to make horrible irreversible decisions.

Decide what you will, but don’t try call wrong right (or right wrong) by redefining it.

The Release of Jack Smith’s Brief

It was not appropriate. First, what happens in a grand jury is secret. It is never supposed to be released unless it is the result of a grand jury investigation. There is a reason for this. In general, the accused never has a chance to defend itself, although the brief is often accepted as accurate fact. It is so to speak, only one side of the story. People who are accused by a grand jury are frequently found innocent. Indeed, once the other side of the story is heard, the case is frequently dropped before getting to court.

Schiff said it was appropriate to release the brief. Then again, he has a record of saying that there was collusion between Trump and Russia and he had proof of it. We now know he never had proof. When asked to produce it, he didn’t. I assure you, he hates Trump so much that if he had the proof, he would have produced it and he didn’t. because the proof was that there was never collusion. I wouldn’t believe the man if he was telling me the time of day. When a person has a long record of lying, we can only assume that when he speaks, he is likely lying.

Consider, someone says that you held up a bank and it went before a grand jury. You would likely never know it. If the grand jury is acting properly, they look at the evidence and see you did not hold up the bank and return a “no bill.” As a result, your life is never interrupted and your good name is not soiled. That is the way a grand jury is supposed to work.

Those on the grand jury are sworn to secrecy, which prevents the prosecutor or anyone on the grand jury from ruining your reputation. Now, that grand jury accusations are in public and Trump was never given the chance to build a defense. It is not the way our justice system is supposed to work. It is not the way you’d want it used on you. At the very least, it should have been accompanied with a statement that it is only an accusation that has yet to be proved.

Moreover, and more important, those that have heard or read the brief should realize that any and all all the statements in the brief have yet to be proved and they should not be accredited as fact.

Finally, any and all statements made by anyone based on that brief should not be treated as fact until, if and when they are proved. Hence, in the news media who use the brief as fact should be utterly disregarded as a legitimate source of reliable news.

It’s Not for Me to Say

A number of times, I have complained about people outside of Mississippi telling us how to run our state. When people who lived in Tennessee keep telling Desoto County that we want gambling casinos, I complained. I wasn’t the only one. We voted them out. They had to go down to Tunica to build their casinos. Incidentally, those that originally built casinos went out of business, I guess in a year or two. The big casino companies moved in and put them out of business. One of the big promises was that the big money from outside of the mid-south would build here. Glad we voted it down for sure now.

The fact of the matter is, the way I feel about it, they had no business using millions of dollars in campaigning here when they lived there. To be sure, it is legal. I see no way of making a law against it. However, it keeps getting more common and more difficult to stop.

I noticed there are ads on the radio on 600 WREC, fighting to keep casinos out. I have no idea who is behind trying to put casinos in, and it is none of my business. People living in Arkansas are running the ads and I feel for them. People with money have the power and they decide it is okay to use it anywhere they want to.

Truth be known, it is likely someone(s) in Tennessee trying to get casinos in Arkansas and the folks in Arkansas don’t like it.

Again, it’s not my fight. I have no business fighting for or against gambling in Arkansas. Then again, those in Tennessee have no business telling those in Arkansas what they want either. It is not right for them to try.

Incidentally, there was one time a talk show host came out against a republican running for governor. It double upset me cause it was not his business. Moreover, the republican lost and we were stuck with one of the worst governors we had in modern times for four years. The talk show host did not have to put up with the dumb dem governor. We did.

I think it is a good idea for us to remember that those state lines are there and we should respect them.

The Illusion

It was all an illusion. It was brought before a liberal Supreme Court and they twisted a few words around and got the result they wanted. However, there was never a right to abortion. Read it yourself. Without turning the words inside out, just try to get such a right out of it.

For decades, the liberals have had their way, but not based on the constitution or any of the amendments. Then, a few of the justices are replaced and they decide to read the real words without the distortion, and the so-called right goes away. The illusion created decades ago fades away. Then, instantly, that method of birth control no longer is convenient or, for that matter legal.

The one thing I noticed is that it changes more than the law. Always before, the abortionists argued that they had a constitutional right to kill, though they used the more palatable terminology. The term abortion becomes a medical procedure instead of killing or murder. I must admit that a medical procedure does sound better, though it doesn’t change what it is. I mean, borrowing does sound so much better than robbery, right.

Now, suddenly, they can’t argue that it is a constitutional right. That has been removed from them. If they are in favor of killing, they must admit that they are in favor of killing. Now, the abortionist mush argue in favor of abortion, not women’s rights. The abortion rights no longer exist.

And so it is, I am a little curious. If the abortionists is going to argue in favor of abortion, will they continue to try to argue the illusion of the right that never existed; or will they start trying to argue that it is righteous to kill defenseless babies?

The Most Important Part

Last night CBS had a news story about fentanyl. It was pretty good, though it seemed to me to be one testimonial one after the other. They also seemed to summarize by saying the solution was education. I have a hard time believing that. We have been teaching about drugs since I was in school, 1950s, without any real success. The use of drugs are far worse now than ever.

The one part, the most important part, they left out is that the main supplier of the drugs is China through the Mexican cartels. Until we deal with China and the cartels, the problem will only get worse. It is what Pres. Trump was doing when the dems took over. China really cut back on their production, though they still did not completely stop.

If you look at the evidence, and only the evidence, a person would come to the conclusion that the dems like to have the drugs and the tragedy they cause. I am open to any evidence to the contrary. Where is the effort to stop China and the cartels as Trump did. I don’t see it. All I see is cooperation with the Chi-coms. I see no evidence of any effort to deal with the cartels.

Want to know what I would do. I would forewarn those south of the border. I’d tell them if they didn’t stop sending us drugs, then I would send 4 marine companies down there. I would tell them I would take no prisoners. They are killing our youth in what amounts to a declaration of war and war is what they would get. As a nation, we have the right to defend our borders and our people.

Do you think the cartels would take notice? Do you think they would stop? I don’t know. However, one way or the other I’d put a stop to it… and all the education would be taking place south of the border… and quickly.

Best to make sure to educate the right people.

As a side note, I would suspect if I were to run for president, I would not get backing from the cartels. I wonder if Kamala is getting any backing from south of the border or the Chi-coms. Do you suppose it is why Old Joe and Kamala want that border open? Only the Lord knows. He will deal with them all. He knows how.

The Real Truth About the Conspiracy Theory

When John F Kennedy was assassinated, an investigation was held. Some of the info was released to the public. The rest was was effectively locked in a vault to be released 50 years later. By the way, some of what they locked away is still locked away, even though it is 60 or nearly 60 years later.

That is a fact. That is the truth. It is not just a conspiracy theory. For some reason at the time, for some reason even now, there are aspects of the killing of JFK that they do not want the public to know. And, when I say they, I must truly admit, I haven’t a clue who they is. They never told us who wants the info withheld.

When they held back on what they determined during in the investigation, they began what is, to this day, an opening to what is known as a conspiracy theory, or more accurately many theories. These theories began to get stronger when things seemed to happen when people tried to open investigations. There was a district attorney who seemed thwarted at every turn. I suppose that most don’t remember, but I do. For some reason, two of his witnesses died at at just the wrong time; before he could bring them to testify. Now, when things like that happen, things feed those theories as a bird feeding her young.

To be sure, there are many who tried to open investigations, some official, most not. It comes to no surprise to me that those efforts were even less successful than the district attorney’s.

Okay. The end of the facts. Still, just what facts are they holding onto and why? Why is it even now that they don’t want the public to know. What and why are they hiding it? Who wants it kept hidden?

Well, actually I can add a little to it. I can because we know that Oswald was a marine and he was trained as I was. I know what kind of training he went through. From that I can come to a few serious conclusions.

A. He would not have ever selected the rifle he chose. It was more likely a rifle provided to him by a fellow conspirator. I would not go around shooting presidents, but I do know marine training. He would have more likely chose a 30-06 semi-automatic. No one in their right mind would use a bolt action for something like that.

B. He might have missed once at that range but not twice. With the semi-auto, he could have gotten off 8 shots and hit with at least 7 shots in the same time.

C. He would have planned his escape far more carefully. Why would he? Because he was a marine. Marines always, always, plan ahead. That tells me that he had a plan that likely involved someone else. It does somewhat make me wonder if the fatal bullet came from that gun. If I had to guess, there were at least 5 involved, more likely 15. Then again that is another story. After all, we must include the person or persons who are keeping the info in the vault.

D. Oswald was killed. When there is a conspiracy planned, the person who does the shooting always gets killed, even if he didn’t do the shooting. That way, the one who planned it all will never be caught. It does make me wonder if the person behind it is still alive. Is the name of the one behind it one of the facts they have in that little vault of theirs.

E. They became very secretive. They hid things from us. They prevented others from finding out what we don’t know. Any time the government does things like that, I smell like rats, rotten fish and a few rotten eggs thrown in. It is the way of the criminal mind, you know, especially with those in high government positions. It is the way they avoid going to prison.

Since that day, there have been a number more secrets held by the government. It has become something of a habit of theirs. It is why they came up with the freedom of information. and still the government will plant their figurative mule feet and refuse to cooperate, as in the JFK case, for our “own” benefit.

It is no longer the exception to the rule but it is more frequent. Why not? They got away with it. They keep getting away with it. They defy us, those whom they are supposed to answer to. We ask and they say we don’t need to know. Sometimes they outright lie about it. Sometimes, in full cooperation with the the media, they claim we are the ones with the conspiracy.

When they are confronted, they say we don’t need to know. Repeatedly, even with the freedom of information act, they slow walk things. They refuse to cooperate until they finally have to. Then, of course, it’s far to late. The info, as important as it was, no longer is.

So, instead of the big explosion there should have been, as with Hunter’s laptop, it turns into a slight poof of smoke and defuses into the surrounding atmosphere. And it works one more time. So it is they learn it works. So it is they will do it again and again until we, the people put it to a stop.

As for us putting it to a stop, I don’t expect it. I’m not holding my breath. And so the pattern will be. You will be able to see it, that is if you keep your eyes open. Every time you see a marine chose a bolt action rifle instead of a semi-automatic .30 caliber. When you seem such things, you will know to be suspicious, as I am. Hopefully, you will be in the position to ask questions. Hopefully, you will.