Tag Archives: Implications

Impartial Judge

Posted in Abuse of Power, Impeachment by

Now let me see. From what I understand, Patrick Leahy will be the unbiased judge during the impeachment trial. Now how is that going to work, being as he has already announced to the entire world that he is convinced that the former president is guilty, long before all the fact are known?

Then, of course, once the trial is over, he is supposed to leave the bench and assume the role of unbiased juror. Speak about twisted justice… At best, if the man is going to sit on the bench, he ought not sit in the juror seat… or visa-versa. It is just not right for one man to sit as both judge and juror. It is not the way the system is supposed to work. I suspect if it came down to it, he would also serve as prosecutor. That position, however is already full.

Then again, they are dummycrats. They can make anything work, legal or not, right or not. It’s all a staged show anyway. They are go through the motions as in a kangaroo trial. It would all be a funny joke if it weren’t so serious. This will have lasting effects on our system.

However, the fact is, it tells for more about the dems than about President Trump. Who else would stand the whole system on its head to make things work the way they want it to.

By the way, for those unable to figure it out on your own, Leahy will neither be an impartial judge or juror. It makes a mockery of the system and, in truth, by itself, nullifies the verdict.

False Implications

Posted in Abuse of Power, Adam Schiff, Christian values, Collusion, Deceit, Elections, Impeachment, Lawyers and Representation, Nadler, Obama, Obama Care, Pelosi, Politcal Opinion, President Trump by

A false implication is another way to say lie or falsehood. It is when a person uses an implication to say that which they know is not exactly true. The democrats have turned it into an art form.

One implication was that they would have never have blocked a vote by a republican president in his last year of office. I’m not gullible enough to swallow that one. Are you? The truth is that, if the situation were reversed they would have done exactly the same thing.

The other implication is that “We the democrats would never appoint and confirm a justice this close to an election.” You believe that one and I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. They believe in doing or saying anything to protect there right to “Choice.”

The truth is that the democrats would have done the same in both situations. There would be one difference. The media would be right there cheering them on. Instead, the media cry out,”Unfair! Unfair!”

I’ll tell you what is unfair, making my wife and me pay those ridiculous insurance prices that Obama Care forced on us. I’ll tell you what unfair is, recalling all our troupes from Iraq exposing over a million people to slaughter.

And by the way, it is also unfair to spy on an incoming president without cause. Truth about that, that’s not just unfair, that is illegal. Whole bunch of democrats ought to go to jail over that, but they never will. You see some people are above the law. All they need is the news media, a bunch of money and a whole lot of conspirators.