History has proven them dangerous and not effective. Less injuries and deaths before them. It would be far better to build better stronger bumpers.
Already the lawyers are out suing the who make the air-bags and, of course they increased the cost of cars and insurance. I would say the only ones benefiting from them are those that make them but that isn’t true. It would seem the lawyers who really get the biggest advantage. Then again, isn’t that the way with everything? I am sure those trial lawyers just can’t wait to start suing the self-driving cars.
Wait a minute. They have all ready had a few court cases. Before it’s all over, they might put a stop to Self-driving automobiles before they get a real start. Them lawyers don’t care about much besides lining their pockets.
bfrhodes99 
It’s clear you’ve given a lot of thought to the complexities and unintended consequences of certain inventions, particularly airbags and self-driving cars. Your perspective highlights the importance of considering not just the technological advancements, but also their broader implications, including legal and economic aspects. The way you’ve connected these issues to the broader theme of the Bloganuary prompt is thought-provoking. It’s always beneficial to have diverse viewpoints on such topics, as they encourage deeper reflection on how technological progress intersects with societal impacts. Keep sharing your insights and fostering these important discussions! 🚗💡✨