Tag Archives: politics

The Illusion

Posted in Abortions, Abuse of Power by

It was all an illusion. It was brought before a liberal Supreme Court and they twisted a few words around and got the result they wanted. However, there was never a right to abortion. Read it yourself. Without turning the words inside out, just try to get such a right out of it.

For decades, the liberals have had their way, but not based on the constitution or any of the amendments. Then, a few of the justices are replaced and they decide to read the real words without the distortion, and the so-called right goes away. The illusion created decades ago fades away. Then, instantly, that method of birth control no longer is convenient or, for that matter legal.

The one thing I noticed is that it changes more than the law. Always before, the abortionists argued that they had a constitutional right to kill, though they used the more palatable terminology. The term abortion becomes a medical procedure instead of killing or murder. I must admit that a medical procedure does sound better, though it doesn’t change what it is. I mean, borrowing does sound so much better than robbery, right.

Now, suddenly, they can’t argue that it is a constitutional right. That has been removed from them. If they are in favor of killing, they must admit that they are in favor of killing. Now, the abortionist mush argue in favor of abortion, not women’s rights. The abortion rights no longer exist.

And so it is, I am a little curious. If the abortionists is going to argue in favor of abortion, will they continue to try to argue the illusion of the right that never existed; or will they start trying to argue that it is righteous to kill defenseless babies?

The Most Important Part

Posted in Uncategorized by

Last night CBS had a news story about fentanyl. It was pretty good, though it seemed to me to be one testimonial one after the other. They also seemed to summarize by saying the solution was education. I have a hard time believing that. We have been teaching about drugs since I was in school, 1950s, without any real success. The use of drugs are far worse now than ever.

The one part, the most important part, they left out is that the main supplier of the drugs is China through the Mexican cartels. Until we deal with China and the cartels, the problem will only get worse. It is what Pres. Trump was doing when the dems took over. China really cut back on their production, though they still did not completely stop.

If you look at the evidence, and only the evidence, a person would come to the conclusion that the dems like to have the drugs and the tragedy they cause. I am open to any evidence to the contrary. Where is the effort to stop China and the cartels as Trump did. I don’t see it. All I see is cooperation with the Chi-coms. I see no evidence of any effort to deal with the cartels.

Want to know what I would do. I would forewarn those south of the border. I’d tell them if they didn’t stop sending us drugs, then I would send 4 marine companies down there. I would tell them I would take no prisoners. They are killing our youth in what amounts to a declaration of war and war is what they would get. As a nation, we have the right to defend our borders and our people.

Do you think the cartels would take notice? Do you think they would stop? I don’t know. However, one way or the other I’d put a stop to it… and all the education would be taking place south of the border… and quickly.

Best to make sure to educate the right people.

As a side note, I would suspect if I were to run for president, I would not get backing from the cartels. I wonder if Kamala is getting any backing from south of the border or the Chi-coms. Do you suppose it is why Old Joe and Kamala want that border open? Only the Lord knows. He will deal with them all. He knows how.

The Real Truth About the Conspiracy Theory

Posted in Uncategorized by

When John F Kennedy was assassinated, an investigation was held. Some of the info was released to the public. The rest was was effectively locked in a vault to be released 50 years later. By the way, some of what they locked away is still locked away, even though it is 60 or nearly 60 years later.

That is a fact. That is the truth. It is not just a conspiracy theory. For some reason at the time, for some reason even now, there are aspects of the killing of JFK that they do not want the public to know. And, when I say they, I must truly admit, I haven’t a clue who they is. They never told us who wants the info withheld.

When they held back on what they determined during in the investigation, they began what is, to this day, an opening to what is known as a conspiracy theory, or more accurately many theories. These theories began to get stronger when things seemed to happen when people tried to open investigations. There was a district attorney who seemed thwarted at every turn. I suppose that most don’t remember, but I do. For some reason, two of his witnesses died at at just the wrong time; before he could bring them to testify. Now, when things like that happen, things feed those theories as a bird feeding her young.

To be sure, there are many who tried to open investigations, some official, most not. It comes to no surprise to me that those efforts were even less successful than the district attorney’s.

Okay. The end of the facts. Still, just what facts are they holding onto and why? Why is it even now that they don’t want the public to know. What and why are they hiding it? Who wants it kept hidden?

Well, actually I can add a little to it. I can because we know that Oswald was a marine and he was trained as I was. I know what kind of training he went through. From that I can come to a few serious conclusions.

A. He would not have ever selected the rifle he chose. It was more likely a rifle provided to him by a fellow conspirator. I would not go around shooting presidents, but I do know marine training. He would have more likely chose a 30-06 semi-automatic. No one in their right mind would use a bolt action for something like that.

B. He might have missed once at that range but not twice. With the semi-auto, he could have gotten off 8 shots and hit with at least 7 shots in the same time.

C. He would have planned his escape far more carefully. Why would he? Because he was a marine. Marines always, always, plan ahead. That tells me that he had a plan that likely involved someone else. It does somewhat make me wonder if the fatal bullet came from that gun. If I had to guess, there were at least 5 involved, more likely 15. Then again that is another story. After all, we must include the person or persons who are keeping the info in the vault.

D. Oswald was killed. When there is a conspiracy planned, the person who does the shooting always gets killed, even if he didn’t do the shooting. That way, the one who planned it all will never be caught. It does make me wonder if the person behind it is still alive. Is the name of the one behind it one of the facts they have in that little vault of theirs.

E. They became very secretive. They hid things from us. They prevented others from finding out what we don’t know. Any time the government does things like that, I smell like rats, rotten fish and a few rotten eggs thrown in. It is the way of the criminal mind, you know, especially with those in high government positions. It is the way they avoid going to prison.

Since that day, there have been a number more secrets held by the government. It has become something of a habit of theirs. It is why they came up with the freedom of information. and still the government will plant their figurative mule feet and refuse to cooperate, as in the JFK case, for our “own” benefit.

It is no longer the exception to the rule but it is more frequent. Why not? They got away with it. They keep getting away with it. They defy us, those whom they are supposed to answer to. We ask and they say we don’t need to know. Sometimes they outright lie about it. Sometimes, in full cooperation with the the media, they claim we are the ones with the conspiracy.

When they are confronted, they say we don’t need to know. Repeatedly, even with the freedom of information act, they slow walk things. They refuse to cooperate until they finally have to. Then, of course, it’s far to late. The info, as important as it was, no longer is.

So, instead of the big explosion there should have been, as with Hunter’s laptop, it turns into a slight poof of smoke and defuses into the surrounding atmosphere. And it works one more time. So it is they learn it works. So it is they will do it again and again until we, the people put it to a stop.

As for us putting it to a stop, I don’t expect it. I’m not holding my breath. And so the pattern will be. You will be able to see it, that is if you keep your eyes open. Every time you see a marine chose a bolt action rifle instead of a semi-automatic .30 caliber. When you seem such things, you will know to be suspicious, as I am. Hopefully, you will be in the position to ask questions. Hopefully, you will.

Possibly, Just a Little Terrified?

Posted in Uncategorized by

I know. How is it that someone can be a little panicked. Either they are afeared or they aren’t, right? Well, let me explain. I’ll let you make up your mind. I’ll let you decide.

Immediately after the debate, Kamala came out and said there will be no more debates. She made it very clear that there will be no more.

My own personal opinion, I would like to see one more, this time on FOX. However, it was already and immediately determined. This is the mark of a woman convinced she not only won the debate, but that she did not need another one. She figured she was already sitting pretty and the election was already in her pocket.

Then, after a couple of days, she decided she did want another debate. After another day, she started begging for another one. She was even trying to goad him into it. She was even taking the old school kid approach and calling him a chicken for not having another debate.

I don’t know how you read that, but to me that means that Kamala has changed her mind. She is terrified that the first debate was not enough. Perhaps someone in her campaign has told her that she might should have actually provided a real answer for at least one of the softball questions given her, or at least the hint of a real answer. She was told by someone in her campaign that the voters have started figuring her out, that she never provides a real answer to any question given her.

But then, someone suggested that the debate be on FOX. Without hesitation, she gave it a solid and emphatic no.

So, my guess is that she is terrified enough that she is begging for another debate, just not terrified enough to go on FOX News where they might actually ask difficult questions she can’t dodge.

As I say… you decide.

Well, one thing we will know. If she becomes desperate enough to suggest to have another debate on FOX, it will eliminate all doubt. Then, she will never permit that. In itself, that she has lost.

How to Deport 20 Million People, Fast

Posted in Uncategorized by

It’s simple. I have said it before. Most of the red states would be very cooperative, such as Texas, Arizona, Florida and so forth. So, we target those illegal aliens in those states. Some would be deported. Some would run to blue states, such as New York and California.

It would not be long that the red states, especially those really red would have few illegal aliens. On the other hand, all those blue states will start figuring out that it is not so much a good thing to welcome illegal aliens. Then, they too, will be cooperative. All those cities and states that welcomed the illegal aliens would not be so welcoming.

Also, we would need to make sure that those who are not legally in the country couldn’t find jobs or shelter. Finally, it would all start with one thing. If an illegal alien is convicted of anything, put them in prison. Immediately after they serve their term, send them home, even if their home doesn’t want them. I am sure we could figure a method to force them to take them back.

Oh yes. One more big thing.

BUILD THE WALL!!

It Is Why the Founding Fathers Required the President to be a Born Citizen

Posted in Uncategorized by

We have, among our Congress, people who are not loyal citizens. If asked, I would guess they would admit it. Their loyalty belongs with Mid-eastern Arab and Persian nations. Some were not born here. Some were. However, the flag they chose to wave is not ours.

The more I think it over, the more I think the founding fathers did not go far enough. They maybe should have required that a person be born and raised in the US, not as Obama. He was born in Hawaii, but spent much of his younger years and education in the Middle-east. I would go one step farther and say that they should have parents born in the US. There are no guarantees of a loyal president, but if it were that way, we would not have had one who was not loyal, namely Obama who has stomped all over the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Also, I would have insisted on one more thing; natural born citizens for House and Senate members. I am sure there are those that would argue with me, but I know of a few that would not be causing us difficulty right now.

Finally, all those who prove to be disloyal after becoming citizens, should have their citizenship revoked for not not honoring their oath of citizenship.

Finally, one more thing. The English language should have been the official language, which means that people would not be able to do business in the US without knowing English or having an interpreter, who would in essence be acting in an official capacity. No paper should be legal unless it is in English.

I am sure that there are many who disagree with me. However, if it had all been set up that way in the beginning, this country would be in a lot better shape. We would not have so many who seek out destruction

from within.

There are those who say that the US is made of immigrants. To which I reply, legal immigrants – not illegal aliens. I say immigrants who took their oath seriously and became true US patriots. The illegal aliens are still loyal to their own country and would go back in a second, provided they could make the living there. That kind of “migrant” we don’t need. Not so much as one, and certainly not by the millions. Even more, we don’t need them in Congress considering that they have soiled the oath they took to become citizens and to become members of the House or Senate.

Then What?

Posted in Uncategorized by

The question comes to mind when you ask one more plausible question. What if a reporter asks just the right question? I don’t know what that question might be, but it just might happen that a reporter asks Kamala just the right question that freezes her as the deer with its eyes caught in the headlights. Even if you haven’t seen it, you have heard of it. The deer might could get away but it doesn’t know which way to go.

Just as with the deer, Kamala freezes and has no idea how to reply to the question. It is a new question, one which she has never been programed to reply. Then, the next day, the polls drop 5 or maybe 6 points. The dems would panic. The question then becomes for them. “THEN WHAT?”

It really is NOT beyond the realm of probability. Actually, it is why they are keeping her in the basement. The dems know it is highly probable if she has. oh,4 or 5 questions a day the reporter will have just the right question. It does take just once, you know. And you know Kamala is very good at inserting her foot in her mouth. On the other hand, whatever the question is might make her panic, worse than the wrong reply. The cameras catch the expression on Kamala’s face and suddenly, the whole world realize Kamala is not presidential material.

It does make me speculate. Maybe, just maybe, with the right encouragement, she would decide to pull out of the election as did Old Joe. Then, who would they replace her with? I don’t know. Maybe the one who is now her running mate. I give up. You tell me.

One thing we know. The dems would not be above another musical chairs move, vote or not. They already proved they are willing and able.

Well, there is one more question that would come to mind. Who would be willing to be thrown in the spotlight under those conditions?

I Would Like to Ask Kamala One Question

Posted in Uncategorized by

It should be in front of the whole world so that one and all could see her reply. The rule would be that she should have to reply without repeating my question back to me. Finally, there would be backing out. Once I ask my short and concise question, she would need to reply in two minutes or less.

It would not be asking much. Most true experts on the subject could provide a good accurate answer in twenty, maybe twenty-five seconds. She would not be allowed to cackle. She would be required to answer accurately and seriously.

She wants to outlaw assault weapons. I wonder if she could provide a real and concise description of an assault weapon. I mean, if we don’t get a definition from her, it would make it very easy for her to keep changing the meaning.

Does it have to be a rifle or does it include slings, as David used on Goliath. Is it only semi-automatic or does it include bolt and lever action. Does it mean only weapons with scopes. If I use a kitchen knife to assault someone, would that make all kitchen knives illegal thereafter.

The fact of the matter is, assault weapon is a very broad term. Truly the first weapon used in an assault was when Cain killed Able. If a person has the proper training, he can kill with his bear hands. It makes it possible to turn a very wide variety of things into assault weapons. It gives the prosecutor a very wide range for prosecuting.

Indeed, it is so wide of a meaning that the Supreme Court could and should disallow any such law because it is so broad. If she really wants to outlaw a gun, she should call it a gun, not an assault weapon. If she wants to outlaw semi-automatics, then she should specify semi-automatics. If she wants to outlaw AR-15s, then she should use the term AR-15s.

While we are on the subject, she said she has a gun. Has she been trained how to use and not use it? Has she been through any safety courses? Does she know not to shoot at someone until she is sure he is a threat? Has she practiced with it to the point of being able to hit what she aiming at.

The fact of the matter is, a gun in the hands of an untrained person is at least as dangerous as just about any weapon, assault or not. I’m guessing about 80% of the peace officers in this country can tell her that from firsthand experience. I have no reference. Just a guess.

Oddly, Some People Believe It

Posted in Uncategorized by

It’s the guns

It’s the guns

It’s the guns

We have to eliminate all guns every time someone gets shot.

It’s the target. it’s the target as soon as they start shooting at Pres. Trump.

Strange as that might seem, as crazy as that sounds, some people believe that line of reasoning, which is promoted by the dems.

It would seem, according to the dems, it is a matter of just whom the target might be. My guess is that if someone started shooting at me, it would be my fault as well.

Was the thought of shooting at Trump originated with the dems? I guess not. On the other hand, much of what they say, encourages it. There have been physical assaults on many republicans and the dems have made it clear it is okay with them, though they might pretend otherwise. They even encourage it in their speeches. Remember, Sen. Rand Paul was assaulted by his neighbor while mowing his lawn and again while walking along the the roads of D.C. Remember those that would have assaulted the Supreme Court justices if they could have. This, of course, while the Justice Department refused them protection. I guess the justices, too are at fault for the attempted assaults on them.

It’s not because of a warped since of justice, though as it would seem so. It just is that some will believe anything the dems say. After all, the dems, the media, and the social media have all spread the word, the orange man is Hitler. How much better would be the world without Hitler. So, by way of twisted reasoning, the dems are saying the world would be better off without the orange man. Hence, by the twisted logic, if someone killed Trump, the would would be far better off. Those that have tried might even be looking at themselves as heroes. On the other hand, there are dems that would agree with them,

I Was Half Right, Maybe

Posted in Uncategorized by

I knew Kamala would want another debate. My best guess now, they looked into the surveys they have been doing since the last debate and they realize their win did not have the affect they hoped for. It’s sort of the thing that happens when you dodge all the questions as if they were bullets.

However, Pres. Trump decided against another the debate. I didn’t expect that when I said I expected another debate. From the way Trump spoke, it sounds pretty much set, although it may yet change. It is always something of a gamble to fight when the outcome is somewhat established already. I understand he is now leading by a point or two. That would mean he is ahead by four. If Trump does come up with an agreement for it to take place at FOX News, he might take it. There is no way that Kamala would get away with not answering questions there and the meet just might amount to a knockout punch, if you will excuse the horrible euphemism. For the same reason, I don’t think Kamala will agree to FOX, unless she becomes desperate.

On a slightly different note, what Pres. Trump said about Kamala’s crowds is real. They rely on paid attendees or big name singers to draw the crowds. Trump manages to draw the crowds all by himself. However, I must admit that I must give some to Kamala too. Some of his followers do leave. I would likely have to be one of those who did. At my age and fitness, I simply could not stay over an hour, if that long. He is about my age and I shake my head when I see him do it. After an hour, I would certainly run out of energy.