Cameras in the Ladies Room?

Don’t do it! Making peepholes. Very bad idea! You can get yourself thrown in jail for that stuff. It’s illegal.

Navigating gender-specific spaces can often be simplified by confidently presenting oneself and proceeding directly. In many jurisdictions, individuals have the legal right to access facilities aligned with their gender identity, making the process more straightforward and efficient. By approaching such situations with self-assurance and an understanding of local regulations, one can minimize potential complications and navigate social environments with greater ease.

The suggestion was not originally conceived by me, but rather proposed by members of the Democratic Party as part of their political strategy and policy discussions. The concept appears to have emerged from their political circles and represents an initiative or proposal put forth by Democratic lawmakers or party representatives.

Democrat Equals Democrat

An important thing to remember is that when you vote for a Democrat, you will get Democratic policies. It is a matter of common sense. Yet, it would seem that some people in this country believe that if they vote Democratic, they will get a middle-of-the-road policies. Hint: there are no more middle-of-the-road Democrats. They are now more extinct than the dodo bird.

So, if you vote Democrat, don’t be surprised when crime rates goes up. Don’t be amazed when your taxes go up and your services begin to degrade (example: Memphis former good bus system; the one that was good until the Democrats had a decade to run it… Into the ground). Don’t be surprised when your third grader can only read at a second grade level. It should not cause you any confusion when young men are permitted in places formerly reserved for the females, also formerly known specifically as women or girls.

You do know of what I am writing. You do know many of us could write a small book on the subject. It is not secret knowledge that can only be found under rocks. It is truly out in the open for all to see, but only for those who, figuratively, open their eyes.

A Twist on Gun Control

In the ongoing debate surrounding gun rights, there may be constructive approach to addressing public safety concerns while respecting constitutional protections.

Being as most of the recent shootings are by people with leftist beliefs, all we need is to make it illegal for liberals to carry guns.

The problem is that it won’t work, for the same reason gun control laws won’t work. No matter the law, the bad guys will always find a way to get guns, even if they have to make them. This, of course, includes those of the tax and spend persuasion. It certainly includes all those who are convinced that President Trump is a modern day Hitler.

Oops, Didn’t Mean it

Such is the perhaps thought of Disney & ABC or maybe even Jimmy Kimmel. I don’t know. For that matter, I don’t know if they meant or mean it.

Disney’s dismissal language suggested a temporary setback, raising questions about potential apologies. Who will step forward, and will their remorse be genuine or merely a calculated public relations strategy designed by high-priced consultants?

Personally, I find these late-night comedy shows utterly unengaging and devoid of any meaningful entertainment value. Their attempts at humor fall flat, failing to elicit even a hint of laughter from me. Moreover, these programs lack substantive content and provide no genuine insights or informative commentary. Given their complete absence of comedic merit or intellectual stimulation, I see absolutely no compelling reason to invest my time in watching them. The shallow nature of their content renders them entirely uninteresting and inconsequential to my viewing preferences.

Some might suggest I should watch them because it is simply the thing to do. I mean, doesn’t everyone watch them? Doesn’t everyone have their favorite? Frequently, it and their remarks become the conversation of the following morning.

If television programming were limited to such contentious content, I would discard my TV without hesitation. Let the pundits continue their endless debates and verbal sparring. Their intentions matter little to me. As the adage suggests, controversy can breed attention, and this spectacle might even attract viewers driven by sheer curiosity about the unfolding drama. As for me, I need it not or even the talk of it.

The Great Pretenders

The haunting melody of “The Great Pretender” by The Platters resonates deeply with my personal journey. This timeless song has become an anthem that mirrors my own experiences of masking inner turmoil. When life dealt me a devastating blow, I perfected the art of wearing a facade, skillfully concealing the profound pain that churned beneath my composed exterior. No one could glimpse the emotional storm raging within me, as I maintained an impenetrable mask of normalcy and strength.

Most people, if they’re honest, experience a period of putting on a facade. In fact, I’d argue that this is universal. Feel free to challenge my perspective, but I remain skeptical of anyone claiming complete authenticity from the start. We all wear masks at some point, whether we choose to acknowledge it or not.

The captivating television series “The Pretender” featured a protagonist with extraordinary intellectual capabilities, enabling him to seamlessly adopt diverse professional identities. In a memorable scene, when questioned about his medical expertise, the main character confidently responded, “I am today,” highlighting his remarkable ability to adapt and excel in any role. Throughout the episode, he skillfully navigated both medical challenges and complex social criminal investigations, ultimately helping a young patient while unraveling a deeper mystery.

To be sure, there are real professional pretenders. Years ago, they told us the greatest danger facing man was global climate change. They pretended to be great experts on the subject.

The silence surrounding the previous climate discussions is puzzling. Have the critical issues truly dissipated, or have they simply been swept under the rug? What unprecedented meteorological phenomenon emerged that warranted such abrupt dismissal? More importantly, why has the discourse fallen silent? Did the purported meteorological authorities conveniently shift their focus, abandoning this critical narrative without substantive explanation? This, of course, while pretending great knowing on who knows what else.

Memphis Criminals

Embarking on a journey to Chicago, a city renowned for its robust legal protections and comprehensive safety measures at every level of government for criminals.

Federal and state law enforcement are intensifying their presence in Memphis, potentially challenging local authorities’ ability to maintain control for those liberals who currently providing some degree of cover for the criminal element.

One more word of caution. Don’t look for cover in the communities surrounding Shelby County. They (we) don’t want y’ll around either.

Basic Intelligence

It has often been said that sometimes a person should keep their mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. Such is so true about AOC who never knows of what she speaks.

I would call her most recent quote to your attention about the late Charlie Kirk, but it is far from the first and I am sure it will not be the last time she has and will confirm her lack of basic intelligence… And honesty!

Saving Lives?

Lately I heard a PSA that announced that thirty percent of fatal accidents were caused by people under the influence of alcohol. So, naturally, to save lives we should keep all those sober people off the the road. After all, they are responsible for nearly three quarters of all fatal auto accidents.

Sound cock-eyed. It is certainly more logical than what I have heard as motivations the dems suggest for the killing of Charlie Kirk.

Contradictions of the Liberals

Several years ago, I wrote a post about people being let across the border. You might think it was during the early years of Trump’s presidency, but it was earlier. Actually, I was speaking out against open borders even before Trump decided to run for president.

During the presidential campaign, the border policy debate revealed a surprising consensus among candidates. While Democrats generally supported more open immigration, many Republican contenders also showed varying degrees of support for less restrictive border policies. In the early stages of Trump’s initial campaign, Senator Ted Cruz stood out as a notable exception, consistently advocating for stricter border control. His principled stance resonated with voters who prioritized immigration enforcement. For this voter, Cruz and Trump were the only candidates worthy of support. I would have abstained from voting any others at all.

Apparently, I wasn’t the only one with that view. Near the last of that primary, Cruz was the only one who gave Trump any competition at all. The rest dropped out. Still, there were Republicans who continued to give Trump grief over illegal aliens, fighting for them from the “humanity” concept. However, to them, humanity had little or nothing to do with it. They wanted the lower illegal wages. It contradicted with the fighting by both the Democrats and the liberal Republican concept of minimum wages. To be sure, hiring illegal aliens is the easiest way around minimum wages. Those who ran hotels and restaurants commonly hired illegal aliens at a fraction of the minimum wage, a financial advantage for businesses (rino Republicans) To some degree, this is still true. The dems fight to keep wages down by encouraging illegal immigration while at the same time, fighting for ridiculously high minimum wages. This has two results. It squeezes rightful American citizens out of the job market while permitting the rich to hire low cost labor.

I very strongly disagree with minimum wages and allowing the employment of illegal aliens. I can at least understand it, as selfish and wrong as it it is. However, lately the liberals have started another contradiction. They fight to require vaccination, especially in schools while continuing to fight to allow diseased and infections aliens across the border without even checking for any disease such as AIDS, measles, TB, etc, etc, and so forth.

I have no clue why we haven’t had breakouts of various diseases when President Biden opened the borders and invited one and all with a public speech. And now, the pro vaccine people complain about a few cases of measles and say nothing of the disease infested flooding over the border. We should count ourselves fortunate that we haven’t had an outbreak of antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis. Or, perhaps something worse. We have dealt with measles, smallpox, and many other outbreaks throughout US history. When the border was opened, I had both concerns and curiosity about what diseases might have been permitted entry. Perhaps even a disease not yet seen inside our border.

To be sure, contradiction is the way of the Democrats. If you keep your eyes open, you’ll see them. Then again, there is none so blind as those who refuse to see, even that which is obvious.