After the Lies

While some may find my language overly strong, I believe it is necessary to convey the gravity of the situation. The countless deaths and immense economic damage that have resulted from these mistakes warrant a forceful response. It is important to address these issues directly and without equivocation.

HOW-SOME–EVER! The actions were deliberate, not accidental. There is a distinction between intentional and unintentional wrongdoing. For this reason, I criticize the leadership of the CDC and, by extension, the previous administration.

And now, somehow, we are supposed to look to the CDC for future guidance. Why? I, personally, have had three blood clots after taking the so-called vaccination the China virus. Not so much as one before. Now, I must take very expensive blood thinners for the rest of my life.

Now, they are telling us to take the vaccines, for the China virus, for the flu, for pneumonia, etc. Are we supposed to trust them? When they require all the various shots before going to school, are we supposed to just take their word for it that they are safe?

Don’t get me wrong. I am in favor of the shots for measles, mumps, etc. However, maybe it is time to take another look at the safety of them. Given the CDC’s record, I do believe it’s warranted. Moreover, would it really hurt? Is the CDC afraid of what will be found? Are those who produce them afraid that they might have to take something off the market until a problem is addressed? Mostly, are they afraid that they, the industry, will take still another hit to their reputation?

The recent concerns about the measles outbreak are understandable and valid. However, it is also important to consider the potential health implications of uncontrolled border crossings.

It suggests that their interests, motivations, and endeavors are misguided or misaligned. It also suggests that when I used the word “lie,” it is more appropriate than using the word “fib.” Indeed, the word “lie” is not strong enough.

A Matter of Reputation

When one person has a reputation of lying and another has a reputation of telling the truth, when the two attest to two different accounts, which one are you apt to believe?

So, let’s see, the dems, in particular those in Old Joe’s administration tells nothing but lies for 4 years, it becomes sorta common knowledge that anything that the dems say will be a lie, especially when others who are eye witnesses says something to the contrary.

Ergo, when the folks in the Appalachian mountains say that they are taking people out of trees after the storm, and the dems say they are providing timely rescue and aid, I have a tendency to believe the Appalachians.

I have no reason to disbelieve the people who are stranded. On the other hand, why in the world should I believe the dems. Moreover, those who are stranded are in a republican part of the state. Draw your own conclusion from that.

I don’t know. However, we have one group of people who say one thing and we have one thing who say something else. You can believe who you want. As for me, I am not going to believe the group who told us that the China virus was not very contagious. Then they said it came out of a wet market, not the lab. Then they got upset with any of us who called it the China virus, saying it was racists. Then we find out, the virus was developed in the lab and purposely spread throughout the world. It took a long time to get them to swallow that lie) Then we are told that the vaccine works. Then we are told it kind of works. Then we are told it kind of works sometimes. Then we are told that masks don’t work and then that they do. So, they actually require them. Then we find out, they were right in the first place. They serve no purpose whatsoever. Then they start requiring children to take the vaccine, though there is no evidence it has any affect on them, the virus or the vaccine. Then children start are having complications from it the vaccine. The dems give us a list of drugs that don’t work and we are told that we are the liars for saying the drugs do work. And on it goes. Just one string of lies after the other.

We are told that Trump colluded with the Russians and they have proof. So they impeach him, though they never ever produce any hard evidence. In the end, it is proved it was a big hoax from the… you got it… the dems.

So, after they have told so many lies, pardon me if I don’t believe one word from the dems without solid evidence. Even then, I’d still have some doubts.

Covid Shots? Really?

Not going to happen with my wife or me.

The thing I have noted is that they really seem to be pushing them, for everyone. This even though it is widely known that the younger and healthier folks would not benefit from them. That is, assuming the shots work in the first place.

It seems at least two or three times an hour, they advertise them, especially for Walgreens. I didn’t think a whole lot about it for a while, but it would seem they are not going to let up. “Got to get your covid shot along with your flu shot you know!”

It seems all the worse for Walgreens. Their brand is on the on the table. If it turns out that the shots are as bad as I believe they are, people are very apt to stop trusting Walgreens. They encourage us to get our flu shots and our pneumonia shots. Then in the same breath, they say, and you better get you covid shot at the same time. The implications are that the vaccine works and is safe.

What is behind this? Are they after the money they get from the shot? This may be, but I don’t think enough that they are willing to put their reputation on the line. They are protected from law suits but not so much from people deciding to shuffle their feet elsewhere and do their business elsewhere. If things are exposed, they might be looking at closing a few stores. It is the way of capitalism. If you turn out bad products or service, people go somewhere else.

With this in mind, I turned my concentration toward the CDC. I mean they are batting a thousand, not only with the China virus but also with AIDS. Thousands, maybe millions have died because they said that AIDS could not be transferred through blood products. That is right. Many of you likely don’t remember that one but I do. (Google Arthur Ashe)

Now, the CDCs reputation is at stake assuming they had one. Do they really come out with an official stand, “Do not take the vaccine. It’s no good.”

Yeah, that is asking for the proverbial, figurative black eye. The next time they come out on a stand for an epidemic, how many will believe them? Maybe the feds will turn the research over to a nice little Christian college.

However, that is just a small part of it. Consider those who produced the drugs. They spent a lot of money developing them. Then, do they openly admit, they failed? This of course while they have millions of doses hanging around in warehouses that must be kept really cold, colder than ice. Then there is the fortune that they put out on gearing up. They created millions of doses. That required a big investment. I suspect they want to get that investment back, even if a few kids have heart problems after.

Then too, their reputation is at stake too. They said, the test indicated the vaccine worked. Obviously, their test was less conclusive than they are willing to admit… or they are outright lying.

I don’t know which. I don’t care which. However, at this time, the government needs to remove the protection against lawsuits. They have had all the time they needed to come up with valid tests. If the vaccine can be proved to be ineffective and they continue to distribute it, they should be open to law suits.