Three Wise Men? Maybe.

It never fails to amaze me how people insist on there being three wise men who visited Jesus on the night of his birth. It shows how tradition can be so misleading.

The biblical narrative of Jesus’s birth reveals nuanced details often misunderstood in popular depictions. Scripture clearly indicates that shepherds were the first to visit the newborn Jesus on the night of his birth, while the wise men arrived later at a house, not the stable. Though traditional nativity scenes frequently portray three wise men, the Gospel of Matthew does not specify their exact number. The actual count could have been two, three, or potentially even twenty travelers who journeyed to pay homage to the child.

Biblical scholars and nativity scene artists often depict an inaccurate representation of the wise men’s visit to Jesus. According to scriptural accounts, the magi did not arrive at the stable where Jesus was born, but rather visited him later in a house, when he was likely a young child. Please read it yourself. Don’t take my word for it.

If we go by the Scripture, which we should, the wise men might have visited as much as two years after Jesus’ birth and likely at least a month later. It may have taken a month or more to move from the manger to a house. Moreover, Matthew calls Jesus a child, not a baby.

Many scholars suggest the visit occurred when Jesus was around one to two years old, based on King Herod’s decree to kill male children under two. While the exact age remains uncertain, it seems most likely that Jesus was slightly older than a toddler. Matthew’s gospel implies he was no longer an infant, as the term “baby” was not used to describe him at this point.

Periodically, I find myself compelled to address this topic, recognizing that not everyone is fully informed. Though some may question its significance, I believe the matter is crucial. Subtle misquotations can be particularly misleading, as even a slight distortion of context or a few misplaced words can fundamentally alter understanding. I’ve often contemplated whether the narrative of the wise men truly belongs within the traditional Christmas narrative, given the potential for misinterpretation.

I Suppose This Is Cheating

I don’t think this is really a direct reply, and I hope you’ll forgive me. You see, it was actually a loaner while my engine was being rebuilt. If I remember correctly, it was a 1970 or 1971 Dodge Sportsman van with a V8.

Over the years, I unsuccessfully sought that specific vehicle. Today’s luxury vans and minivans differ greatly, and the rising prices have made such a model unattainable for me.

Visibility was excellent. Large windows provided clear views at stop signs, making traffic monitoring effortless.

Later, I had a VW van that had many advantages but really lacked power and air conditioning. I could have lived without the power, and while living in California, I could have lived without the AC. However, the small engine came with reliability problems. Also, it didn’t have sufficient heating on cold nights.

I will say this for the VW van: Put chains on it, and it would go through ten inches of snow. I know; I did it.

Now if they would just put a V8 in something like that VW and keep it basic. Somehow, I don’t think that is going to happen.

Things to Remember

It’s never the right time to do the wrong thing

Almost all temporary solutions become permanent

Stuff has a tendency to accumulate, sometimes multiplies

Money does not fix everything, but, sometimes it comes in handy. It might not be such a good idea to give it to casinos.

Perhaps I should remember this one. You can easily find those willing to tell you what to think. It is a little more difficult to find those wanting to hear what you think.

Euphemism

A gentler, more diplomatic term used in place of a direct or potentially offensive phrase, typically employed when discussing sensitive, uncomfortable, or taboo subjects.

For example, use “undocumented migrant” instead of the improper term “illegal alien.” Woe to the news person who uses the incorrect word, or politician. Old Joe made the mistake, and they brought him out in microseconds to make the apology and correction. Can’t have the leader of the dems using such terms.

Democrat rhetoric often employs euphemisms to subtly mislead, presenting distortions as implied truths.

Something a Little Different, Please?

As the evening radio crackled with another traffic report, I caught the familiar refrain of a roadway collision: “Accident on Goodman Road and Interstate-55.” The precise location blurred in my mind—was it at the intersection or along the highway? Such announcements have become so routine that they barely register as noteworthy anymore, a sobering reflection on road safety and daily commuter risks.

I rarely comment on local issues, but the situation at this interchange has become unbearable. The frequency of daily accidents is alarming, with collisions occurring with such regularity that it seems this might be the most dangerous intersection in Mississippi. The consistent pattern of crashes demands immediate attention and intervention from local transportation authorities.

At Interstate 55’s junction near Goodman Road, the highway configuration is notable. Southbound traffic flows through three lanes, with three lanes concluding at or adjacent to the Goodman Road overpass. The northbound direction features six expansive lanes, providing substantial capacity for travelers moving in that direction.

The Goodman Road bridge spans seven lanes, with one dedicated to eastbound left-turning vehicles, somewhat facilitating smooth traffic flow and efficient transportation. Much of the traffic turns north towards the hospital or the Lowes store. To help, the one lane splits into two.

The intersection’s complexity stems from its proximity to multiple major destinations. Surrounding the junction are two shopping centers to the north and another sizeable retail complex to the southeast, with a large hospital positioned to the northeast. These locations generate significant traffic congestion. Drivers navigate multiple turning patterns: some aim to head south on Highway 55, others seek to access Walmart via Goodman Road eastbound. Conversely, northbound travelers on 55 may need to transition to Goodman Road’s eastern route, while those bound for the hospital must strategically cross multiple lanes to make a timely left turn.

The interchange’s intricate design forces drivers to navigate multiple lane crossings, often catching unfamiliar motorists off guard. Many travelers may not anticipate the complexity of the roadway ahead, potentially leading to confusion and increased risk of traffic disruptions.

The complexity of daily travel is heightened by the necessity of crossing the interstate, a challenge that impacts numerous motorists. My personal experience illustrates this inconvenience: my medical provider is located on the opposite side of the highway, and nearly every destination requires navigating this infrastructural barrier. I am sure I am far from the only one with this problem.

The daily commute transforms into a nightmare as rush hour descends. What begins as a manageable journey quickly deteriorates into a traffic standstill. By late afternoon, Interstate 55’s three southbound exit lanes funneling onto Goodman Road become a sea of motionless vehicles. Most evenings, the interchange resembles a parking lot, trapping drivers in an endless, frustrating gridlock. Vehicles on the bridge remain stranded, unable to exit due to massive backups extending in both directions. By 5 PM, the southbound exit lanes stretch into a serpentine line of brake lights, extending one to two miles, testing even the most patient drivers’ resolve.

A persistent issue has been unfolding before my eyes, and I find myself questioning whether others recognize its significance. The extent of apparent indifference is startling, leading me to suspect this neglect might be deliberate. As the familiar saying goes, “out of sight, out of mind” seems to be the prevailing attitude. Despite the problem’s escalating nature, there appears to be a troubling absence of proposed solutions or meaningful discourse addressing its underlying complexities.

My words might seem futile, but if shared, they could gradually propel our solution forward, much like the slow crawl of rush-hour traffic inching toward its destination.

Yup

We have seven cats. No, they aren’t wild animals. They are too tame. If I sit down for ten minutes, three or four find places on me to make themselves comfortable. The thing is, I wanted them to get used to staying outside more. So, I started feeding them out on the front porch. One day, I checked on them after putting their dinner out. Amongst them was an adult raccoon. The surprise was that all of them seemed to get along. No one, even the raccoon, seemed to mind sharing. I never figured a raccoon would do that.

Needless to say, the cats now are back to eating indoors. As for the racoon, he’s found somewhere else to eat. Hopefully, he’ll not return.

Just What it Means?

Persistent telemarketing calls about Medicare have become a daily nuisance, bombarding me with about three unsolicited pitches each day. Unlike other product advertisements, these Medicare-related calls seem to dominate my phone’s incoming traffic, completely overshadowing potential solicitations for vehicles or miscellaneous products.

The unsolicited calls from potential home buyers have ceased, leaving me with an uncanny ability to anticipate the caller’s intent before the phone even rings.

Just now, I got another one of those calls. It made me ask myself, “What does that mean?” Someone, somewhere must be planning to make money from the call. Logic says, even if they succeed one out of a hundred calls, someone must be making some real money making those calls. Just how? I mean, to hear their spiel, they are only calling to help me. You and I know that’s a lie. They are making money, and that is their design. If they provide help, it is purely accidental.

That tells me there is a lot of money involved for someone. But who?

Hope & Change?

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama pledged to stimulate the economy through infrastructure projects that were “shovel ready.” However, as his first term progressed, he had to admit the projects were not so “shovel ready”. I submit that he never intended to keep the promise.

The monies intended for the projects ended up in the pockets of his campaign supporters, his comrades and his cronies. Millions went into a now defunct solar battery plant. Though the plant went under, those that received the Federal funds to start it came out of it financially healthy, far more so than at the start.

After two terms as president, Obama was very financially more healthy, now living the life of a multimillionaire. He has homes, large homes in Hawaii, Martha’s Finished (or something like that) and I think he ha a third. Who paid for those things. He didn’t have the money before he was president and I don’t think he made that much as president. That money came from somewhere. Should we just ignore the obvious.

He promised we could keep our doctors and medical plan. Oops, that wasn’t true either. He had to admit to it. He didn’t admit that he lied. His admission was more of a brag than an admission of the lie.

He promised hope. The only hope we had after his final term was being provided by his successor. Again, his promises of hope were an intentional lie.

Finally, there was a promise of change. Yes, this promise he kept, and ever since, we have been living with it. Ever since, we have been endeavoring to reverse those changes.

Well, he did leave us with an important lesson. Not all change is good. It has been an expensive lesson.

Advertising Isn’t Everything

Coca-Cola’s advertising campaigns brilliantly capture the essence of joy, connection, and shared moments, making their commercials not just advertisements, but memorable storytelling experiences that resonate with audiences worldwide.

Still, when I have a choice, I choose Diet Pepsi because I think it tastes better. Sometimes, it is a matter of taste.