Such is the perhaps thought of Disney & ABC or maybe even Jimmy Kimmel. I don’t know. For that matter, I don’t know if they meant or mean it.

Disney’s dismissal language suggested a temporary setback, raising questions about potential apologies. Who will step forward, and will their remorse be genuine or merely a calculated public relations strategy designed by high-priced consultants?

Personally, I find these late-night comedy shows utterly unengaging and devoid of any meaningful entertainment value. Their attempts at humor fall flat, failing to elicit even a hint of laughter from me. Moreover, these programs lack substantive content and provide no genuine insights or informative commentary. Given their complete absence of comedic merit or intellectual stimulation, I see absolutely no compelling reason to invest my time in watching them. The shallow nature of their content renders them entirely uninteresting and inconsequential to my viewing preferences.

Some might suggest I should watch them because it is simply the thing to do. I mean, doesn’t everyone watch them? Doesn’t everyone have their favorite? Frequently, it and their remarks become the conversation of the following morning.

If television programming were limited to such contentious content, I would discard my TV without hesitation. Let the pundits continue their endless debates and verbal sparring. Their intentions matter little to me. As the adage suggests, controversy can breed attention, and this spectacle might even attract viewers driven by sheer curiosity about the unfolding drama. As for me, I need it not or even the talk of it.

Embarking on a journey to Chicago, a city renowned for its robust legal protections and comprehensive safety measures at every level of government for criminals.

Federal and state law enforcement are intensifying their presence in Memphis, potentially challenging local authorities’ ability to maintain control for those liberals who currently providing some degree of cover for the criminal element.

One more word of caution. Don’t look for cover in the communities surrounding Shelby County. They (we) don’t want y’ll around either.

It has often been said that sometimes a person should keep their mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. Such is so true about AOC who never knows of what she speaks.

I would call her most recent quote to your attention about the late Charlie Kirk, but it is far from the first and I am sure it will not be the last time she has and will confirm her lack of basic intelligence… And honesty!

Lately I heard a PSA that announced that thirty percent of fatal accidents were caused by people under the influence of alcohol. So, naturally, to save lives we should keep all those sober people off the the road. After all, they are responsible for nearly three quarters of all fatal auto accidents.

Sound cock-eyed. It is certainly more logical than what I have heard as motivations the dems suggest for the killing of Charlie Kirk.

The Chicago mayor and the Illinois governor stands ready to stand and protect them from the president.

Now, who protects the people of Chicago from the criminals … and the government?

In the aftermath of the incident involving Charlie Kirk, I find myself pondering the circumstances surrounding the shooting, particularly the origin of the weapon used. Typically, in such events, media reports meticulously trace the firearm’s source, offering insights into the acquisition process.

The origins of the item remained shrouded in mystery. Did he acquire it through purchase, receive it as a gift, or perhaps obtain it through less conventional means? The true nature of his possession was uncertain. Just how much did he practice in the previous week, month, or perhaps year? I would like to know how commonly he used the gun. I mean people generally don’t shoot that well…with the gun he is going to use.

I practice regularly with my gun. It helps to improve my accuracy and confidence. Anyone knows most of us are not capable of just picking up a rifle and the next day, successfully shoot someone through the neck the next day.

I don’t care what the man’s name is nearly as much as I want to know who taught the guy how to hold the weapon and carefully pull the trigger. Even how to breathe is important from that range. Breathing while pulling the trigger can throw the aim off.

Uncertainty shrouded the number of bullets he carried. Typically, such details would be reported, yet this instance remained conspicuously silent. The absence of information raised questions about the circumstances surrounding this particular event.

Okay. You get the idea. I could go on asking these questions. Just seems to me, this time, far more than previous instances to be of a collaborative endeavor with multiple individuals working in concert to support a singular mission.

President Trump is deploying National Guard troops to Memphis, a city located just north of DeSoto County, where I currently reside.

It will be a good thing to stop all crimes in Memphis. This will also reduce the southward migration of those seeking a safer environment. That, in turn, will reduce the growth in my home value. I was really getting used to the way my home value was climbing.

Then again, it might all be temporary and short term considering that most Memphians only vote Democrat.

I perceive the world through a unique lens, setting me apart from conventional thinking. While others might ponder various inquiries, my focus remains singular: understanding the circumstances surrounding the tragic event involving Charlie Kirk and seeking accountability for the responsible individual.

The true purpose of his actions remained a mystery, leaving me curious about his ultimate objective.

Allow me to explain. I think most trained snipers will tell you that aiming at the neck is a very improbable death shot. I won’t go through the details but generally the point of aim is the chest. Yet the man hit Kirk in a vital part of the neck.

His incompetence was almost poetic. While his aim might have been abysmal, the cruel irony was that his near-total failure still managed to inflict damage. A few inches in any direction would have rendered his attempt completely futile, but fate seemed to mock the very notion of precision with this imperfect strike.

The precision of his shot reveals more about his character than he might realize. Was his target deliberately chosen, or did his aim simply fall short? The truth behind his claim speaks volumes about his skill and integrity. If he insists he struck exactly where intended, yet the evidence suggests otherwise, his credibility becomes questionable.

Hitting A man with a rifle from two hundred yards does not take much skill. Intentionally hitting a man’s artery at that range borders on being impossible.

Irregardless, if the man is convicted, he needs to be given the worst possible penalty. It is important that others realize what is waiting for them should they decide to follow the example set by this animal.