The Assumptions

Assuming Old Joe wanted a border in control, after 3 years, why hasn’t he fixed it?

Assuming Old Joe wanted safe streets, after 3 years, why aren’t the safe?

There are far more examples, but I think I’ve made my point.

Backlashed

Backlash is the word used in in the articles I read about Biden’s intentions to remove any recollection of the iconic celebrated kiss on Times Square. Instantaneously, the effort ceased.

The whole thing was virtually over by the time I heard of it. Then, I began thinking about it. In truth, this is an attempt at thought control. It was an attempt to change, or should I say destroy history.

The woman didn’t object. As a matter of fact, the two became friends. Then, all of a sudden, the dems decided it was time for that little segment of our our national history to just quietly disappear.

Then PEOPLE “backlashed,” if I may say. They got together and said, Don’t do that! Figuratively, of course. notice no quotation marks.

My original thought was, that was good. I would really like that little part of our history to remain for a century or two. I don’t have much hope for that. When the dems want something destroyed, it will be destroyed. It is simply a matter of time. Once the incident fades from memory, they will make another attempt, but more carefully.

They will use the same methods they used on the statues. 50 years ago, people would have backlashed when people destroyed statues.

However, once the dems remolded the statues into evil icons, they are gone. Gone too, is the history behind them all, be that good or be that bad.

As I said, mind control. And where be the backlash? Who stands in the way of such righteous indignation, but for a fleeting moment.

50 years ago, the open borders of Old Joe would never have been tolerated. It would have been backlashed.

Today any effort to close the border has become evilized by the dems and by the press. (Redundant. Press and dems, same-same.)

It’s more than a pattern. It is a method to control history, minds and our future, by control of our past. And, you see. There is no backlash. Today, our Constitution is history. Tomorrow, it will be evil. A little while later, it will be gone.

Even now the the thought engineers are busy designing ways to make the Bible and Christianity evil. Need I explain what they intend to do next. If they can make it evil, they can destroy it.

An Afterthought

Reference: previous post, Two Reports.

Don’t know why I always think of these things late. May we for a moment assume that the report is true about Old Joe flying all these, illegals into the country. I am sure we tax payers are picking up the tab.

On the other hand, each passenger might be paying 4 or 5 thousand dollars to… Old Joe. Without doing the math, I think that is a bunch of money. Then too, it might not ever be declared on his taxes. How is the IRS going to find out. who’s going to drop the dime on Old Joe, the man with the Justice Department in his pocket.

Two Reports

From a few sources, I have heard of Old Joe admitting to transporting 320 thousand illegal aliens from physical locations outside our borders into the US.

Then I have heard the cheerleaders (aka news anchors) jeer at the report, saying it would be improbable. He said it would be far too many.

Let’s look at it this way. Is it really a good thing that we find such a thing remotely believable? I mean, the fact is, if he could and he could get away with it, I don’t think he would hesitate for a moment. Indeed, in fear he might take up the idea, he could put 5000 at a time on cruise ships. I am sure there are cruise lines ready and willing to provide the ships, maybe 3 or 4. Moreover, I am sure the illegal aliens would much rather travel in the luxury of a cruise ship instead of hiking through the jungles and swimming the rivers.

Besides, it would likely be about a quarter the cost of paying the cartels. Just how many ships could they run before his term is over?

The Pretender

An old NBC TV show. Also, a definition of Old Joe. He keeps trying to say he’s saving democracy while all the time doing what he can to destroy it.

He keeps saying he is trying to save the Constitution while all disobeying it.

He says he needs more laws to control the border while he was the one who put it in disarray, even to the point of illegally using taxpayer money [unconditionally] to spread the illegally throughout the country, especially the red states.

He pretends he wants progress while all the time causing destruction.

Old Joe pretends to be a Democrat while all the time he while all the time he’s more of a communist than any of the leaders of the USSR.

Worst of all, he has made decision after decision that cost countless lives worldwide. He simply has no answer for that.

SCOTUS Overturns Colorado SC

So far, the reaction from the libs is one of horror. It seems they don’t like it that it will all have to be settled by the voters.

I sorta thought that was the idea. I like it. It is called democracy. I should think the dems would like that… that is, unless democracy is not really the goal of the dems.

Can you possibly imagine a Democrat who doesn’t want democracy. Can you imagine a true pro American not in favor of settling things honestly at the ballot box.

The Tragedy of Relief

It is an old and true rule of thumb: If you want to find the leaders of a country under siege, just look for those who are well fed. If we could walk freely amongst those in the Gaza strip, we would find a few of them that visibly never missed a meal.

The reason is simple, as long as there is a morsel in Gaza, the HAMAS leaders will not go hungry. Not only will they have sustenance, but they will have the best; this while the children go hungry.

And so it is, when we send relief to Gaza, we prolong the war while those guilty of ordering war crimes are strengthened remain well fed.

When the leaders within Gaza begin missing meals, then they will cease to make war. Then and only then, will the war really end. Until then, there will only be cease fires, times to re-arm and resupply. Oh yes. also a time for recommitment speeches.

Scrap Metal

The local Memphis news here, as far as I know all 4 network stations, keep showing videos of men using equipment to tear apart guns of all types, shapes and sizes.

The explanation… they were making gardening tools from them. I guess it was an effort of a take-off on the Biblical beating swords in plows. I know not.

However, all the news stations seemed to have the same implication, “See, we are destroying the guns. Now all the murders will stop.”

I don’t think it will work that way. I suspect that it won’t slow them down. Moreover, I don’t think it will have the slightest effect on shootings either.

Then again, it’s not the success that counts to the liberal. But it is rather the thought that counts. They do mean well.

Nikki Won One

Really. She did. She’s very proud of it too. Not only that, the news media is really beating the drums.

However, let’s take a closer look. It was the District, the swamp. That place rots the brain inside a decade. It is perhaps, the primary reason for term limits. We need to get our representation out of there before that part between their ears start malfunctioning.

Moreover, only 3000 so-called Republicans voted. My best guess, less than half were Republicans. I have a hard time buying the concept that there are 3000 Republicans in DC who are eligible to vote.

Nonetheless, all the network news shows brought out the cheerleeding crowd and tried to make it look really, really good, which made it look really bad for those of us who know better than to bite on such things.

As an aside, a staff of Old Joe’s lied again about guns being the major cause of deaths in the US. How can they hope to get away with such things when it is so easy to prove that drugs are by far thebiggest cause, twice guns. More if you count those cased indirectly from gang wars and efforts by the those who just must buy more of the poison for one more big high.

He also said that no one but the but the killer of that woman can be held accountable for the killing. I guess that means no one can hold gun manufacturers guilty for murders. We certainly can’t hold the NRA responsible. Actually, it is something the NRA has trying to say for a long time. Even though so many so frequently try to blame all but the killers.

Learning the Obvious & the Strange

I have a bad memory. Sometimes I learn things and I haven’t a clue where I learn them. Nonetheless, I now know that the primary purpose of a holster is to guard the trigger.

Now how about that. All these years, I thought it was to hold the gun. It does help to explain something I learned a while ago. While a gun, short or long, is being carried in an auto, it must be holstered. Now I understand the reason for the law.

It makes sense. I should have onown beforehand. It is obvious. I write this in the possibility it just might help others. I mean, just because something is obvious, doesn’t mean we all know and understand it.

Then, while researching the holster thing, I found something that floored me. That means, it confused me. It seems that in most, if not all states, it is against the law to install compartments in autos to hide guns in.

Let me explain. In this area, there’s a problem with guns being stolen from autos. You might say it’s an epidemic. Virtually, every day, they say something on the news about it.

So, silly me, I start thinking about building a place in my car to hide my gun. You know, so I can safely leave my weapon in my car while I go into a place where it is unwise to bring it.

You have no idea how much thought I put into it. I even considered putting some money into it. Now, I’m thinking that’s strange. They want me to make sure my weapon is secure in my car before I enter, let’s say, a bank, but they will not let me put it in a constructed concealed compartment.

It doesn’t stop there. This also applies to RVs, boats, yachts and I would guess horse drawn carriages.

To some degree, I understand. It is a bad thing to let criminals hide things, including drugs, in vehicles and haul them anywhere and everywhere. The hitch is, they do that anyway. Frequently, they are caught and they still do it. I suspect it doesn’t slow them down.

At any rate. Maybe I have saved others the embarrassment of others finding out about the law the hard way.

Now. Just how do I keep the bad guys from stealing my weapon whilst I am in a restaurant. Guess I will need to resort to the drive throughs.