I’ve heard the arguments hundreds of times. A few times, I even started doubting my own logic. Some people say the only way to reduce drug abuse is to decrease drug users. They say it is a demand-driven problem, which does sound somewhat logical.

Some argue that the issue stems from a supply-driven dynamic, which may appear less rational. Yet, I find myself aligning with this perspective, even if the reasoning seems counterintuitive. My stance has consistently been that disrupting distribution networks should take precedence over targeting individual users. However, I do not advocate for total absolution of users; they must ultimately bear responsibility for their choices and face appropriate consequences.

When push comes to shove, I do believe it has been decided. The numbers reveal the facts. Though the news media are doing their best to play it down, drug usage has taken a nosedive since President Trump has drastically decreased successful importation of drugs. I can’t find anywhere on the internet telling the “overdoses” of fentanyl, but it would seem we are having a decrease of 30 or 35% or more. And by the way, some of this poison is still getting through. I’m guessing that by the end of this year, the deaths from fentanyl will be a tenth of what they were in 2024.

While logic may seem elusive, the core issue transcends rational analysis and speaks to fundamental human experiences. The complexity of border security involves protecting communities and preventing the entry of harmful substances and individuals that could threaten public safety. media coverage should do the responsible thing and accurately & carefully report the big decreases in deaths by ‘overdose.’