In principle, free trade without tariffs is an admirable goal. Yet, economic realities often demand a more nuanced approach. When foreign nations strategically employ tariffs to undermine domestic industries, a measured response becomes necessary. The alternative is watching critical sectors like manufacturing slowly erode, as witnessed in the Rust Belt’s decline before recent trade policy shifts.The reinvigoration of steel and aluminum industries demonstrates how targeted tariffs can protect national economic interests. Beyond economic considerations, there are profound strategic implications. A robust domestic steel industry is not merely an economic asset but a critical national security imperative. In potential conflict scenarios, dependence on foreign—potentially adversarial—steel supplies could compromise our strategic capabilities.While free trade remains an ideal, protecting core industrial capacities must take precedence when international economic dynamics threaten national economic and military preparedness. Balanced, strategic trade policies can help maintain both economic competitiveness and national resilience.

The global aerospace industry faces complex challenges, particularly in commercial aircraft manufacturing. European nations like England and France have strategically collaborated to develop Airbus, leveraging government funding to support design and production. This coordinated effort aims to compete directly with American aircraft manufacturers, potentially creating a dominant market position. The decline of McDonnell Douglas has already reduced competition within the United States, and increasing Airbus purchases could further impact domestic employment in the aerospace sector. These dynamics underscore the importance of maintaining a competitive and diverse industrial landscape across multiple sectors, not just aviation. We certainly DO NOT want to be caught with monopolies in Europe, or any other country, especially China.