It has often been said that sometimes a person should keep their mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. Such is so true about AOC who never knows of what she speaks.
I would call her most recent quote to your attention about the late Charlie Kirk, but it is far from the first and I am sure it will not be the last time she has and will confirm her lack of basic intelligence… And honesty!
Lately I heard a PSA that announced that thirty percent of fatal accidents were caused by people under the influence of alcohol. So, naturally, to save lives we should keep all those sober people off the the road. After all, they are responsible for nearly three quarters of all fatal auto accidents.
Sound cock-eyed. It is certainly more logical than what I have heard as motivations the dems suggest for the killing of Charlie Kirk.
Several years ago, I wrote a post about people being let across the border. You might think it was during the early years of Trump’s presidency, but it was earlier. Actually, I was speaking out against open borders even before Trump decided to run for president.
During the presidential campaign, the border policy debate revealed a surprising consensus among candidates. While Democrats generally supported more open immigration, many Republican contenders also showed varying degrees of support for less restrictive border policies. In the early stages of Trump’s initial campaign, Senator Ted Cruz stood out as a notable exception, consistently advocating for stricter border control. His principled stance resonated with voters who prioritized immigration enforcement. For this voter, Cruz and Trump were the only candidates worthy of support. I would have abstained from voting any others at all.
Apparently, I wasn’t the only one with that view. Near the last of that primary, Cruz was the only one who gave Trump any competition at all. The rest dropped out. Still, there were Republicans who continued to give Trump grief over illegal aliens, fighting for them from the “humanity” concept. However, to them, humanity had little or nothing to do with it. They wanted the lower illegal wages. It contradicted with the fighting by both the Democrats and the liberal Republican concept of minimum wages. To be sure, hiring illegal aliens is the easiest way around minimum wages. Those who ran hotels and restaurants commonly hired illegal aliens at a fraction of the minimum wage, a financial advantage for businesses (rino Republicans) To some degree, this is still true. The dems fight to keep wages down by encouraging illegal immigration while at the same time, fighting for ridiculously high minimum wages. This has two results. It squeezes rightful American citizens out of the job market while permitting the rich to hire low cost labor.
I very strongly disagree with minimum wages and allowing the employment of illegal aliens. I can at least understand it, as selfish and wrong as it it is. However, lately the liberals have started another contradiction. They fight to require vaccination, especially in schools while continuing to fight to allow diseased and infections aliens across the border without even checking for any disease such as AIDS, measles, TB, etc, etc, and so forth.
I have no clue why we haven’t had breakouts of various diseases when President Biden opened the borders and invited one and all with a public speech. And now, the pro vaccine people complain about a few cases of measles and say nothing of the disease infested flooding over the border. We should count ourselves fortunate that we haven’t had an outbreak of antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis. Or, perhaps something worse. We have dealt with measles, smallpox, and many other outbreaks throughout US history. When the border was opened, I had both concerns and curiosity about what diseases might have been permitted entry. Perhaps even a disease not yet seen inside our border.
To be sure, contradiction is the way of the Democrats. If you keep your eyes open, you’ll see them. Then again, there is none so blind as those who refuse to see, even that which is obvious.
The Chicago mayor and the Illinois governor stands ready to stand and protect them from the president.
Now, who protects the people of Chicago from the criminals … and the government?
In the aftermath of the incident involving Charlie Kirk, I find myself pondering the circumstances surrounding the shooting, particularly the origin of the weapon used. Typically, in such events, media reports meticulously trace the firearm’s source, offering insights into the acquisition process.
The origins of the item remained shrouded in mystery. Did he acquire it through purchase, receive it as a gift, or perhaps obtain it through less conventional means? The true nature of his possession was uncertain. Just how much did he practice in the previous week, month, or perhaps year? I would like to know how commonly he used the gun. I mean people generally don’t shoot that well…with the gun he is going to use.
I practice regularly with my gun. It helps to improve my accuracy and confidence. Anyone knows most of us are not capable of just picking up a rifle and the next day, successfully shoot someone through the neck the next day.
I don’t care what the man’s name is nearly as much as I want to know who taught the guy how to hold the weapon and carefully pull the trigger. Even how to breathe is important from that range. Breathing while pulling the trigger can throw the aim off.
Uncertainty shrouded the number of bullets he carried. Typically, such details would be reported, yet this instance remained conspicuously silent. The absence of information raised questions about the circumstances surrounding this particular event.
Okay. You get the idea. I could go on asking these questions. Just seems to me, this time, far more than previous instances to be of a collaborative endeavor with multiple individuals working in concert to support a singular mission.
President Trump is deploying National Guard troops to Memphis, a city located just north of DeSoto County, where I currently reside.
It will be a good thing to stop all crimes in Memphis. This will also reduce the southward migration of those seeking a safer environment. That, in turn, will reduce the growth in my home value. I was really getting used to the way my home value was climbing.
Then again, it might all be temporary and short term considering that most Memphians only vote Democrat.
I perceive the world through a unique lens, setting me apart from conventional thinking. While others might ponder various inquiries, my focus remains singular: understanding the circumstances surrounding the tragic event involving Charlie Kirk and seeking accountability for the responsible individual.
The true purpose of his actions remained a mystery, leaving me curious about his ultimate objective.
Allow me to explain. I think most trained snipers will tell you that aiming at the neck is a very improbable death shot. I won’t go through the details but generally the point of aim is the chest. Yet the man hit Kirk in a vital part of the neck.
His incompetence was almost poetic. While his aim might have been abysmal, the cruel irony was that his near-total failure still managed to inflict damage. A few inches in any direction would have rendered his attempt completely futile, but fate seemed to mock the very notion of precision with this imperfect strike.
The precision of his shot reveals more about his character than he might realize. Was his target deliberately chosen, or did his aim simply fall short? The truth behind his claim speaks volumes about his skill and integrity. If he insists he struck exactly where intended, yet the evidence suggests otherwise, his credibility becomes questionable.
Hitting A man with a rifle from two hundred yards does not take much skill. Intentionally hitting a man’s artery at that range borders on being impossible.
Irregardless, if the man is convicted, he needs to be given the worst possible penalty. It is important that others realize what is waiting for them should they decide to follow the example set by this animal.
Charlie Kirk’s unwavering commitment to his principles inspired many. By continuing to champion the values he believed in, those who sought to silence him will ultimately fail. His legacy serves as a powerful reminder that dedication to his Christian convictions can transcend attempts to suppress his meaningful work.
Therefore, let us commit ourselves to the Christian and conservative ideals that were his.
While with others, it might effect the next 4 or 5 years, Charlie Kirk would have effected the next 3 or 4 decades.
One of my first posts was a true story about my wife and her very persistent rash. She had visited multiple doctors, and still the rash persisted. Finally, in an act of frustration, we changed from Tide laundry detergent.
The rash vanished instantly, prompting me to share my experience not out of frustration, but to help others facing similar challenges. My journey revealed potential issues with certain personal care products, including a widely used bath soap that I now carefully avoid. By speaking out, I hope to provide valuable insights and support to those seeking solutions to unexpected skin reactions.
Furthermore, this might be a call to be careful to completely rinse the soap, regardless of the brand or type.
Recently, after publishing my blog post about laundry detergents for sensitive skin, I was intrigued to see Tide launch a new product line targeting this specific market. While I can’t definitively say my writing influenced their decision, I can’t help but wonder if my message resonated with the company. Perhaps my small contribution has helped raise awareness about the needs of those with sensitive skin.
How-some-ever, this is far from the last of notes that make me wonder if I’ve done a little good. I have seen some changes that make me suspicious that I might have.
On the other hand, maybe not. Maybe I am just being a little egotistical. I must say, I do believe that more little efforts have had some effect. When someone takes the time and effort to tell me there is no God, it tells me he might not be the only one to consider my argument.
Embracing our collective mission, I find value in every contribution, regardless of individual outcomes. Being part of this team is a profound privilege, even if my role seems minor. My true success may lie in supporting a fellow team member’s efforts to guide someone towards spiritual transformation, highlighting the power of collaborative purpose.
The ripple effect of a single conversion can be profound, potentially inspiring countless others to embrace faith. Ultimately, the significance lies not in my personal success, but in guiding individuals toward a transformative spiritual choice that impacts their eternal destiny and deepens their connection with Christ.
Every individual’s salvation ripples through humanity, subtly or profoundly transforming the collective human experience. When one life is rescued, redirected, or redeemed, the potential for positive change expands exponentially, creating unseen yet meaningful impact on our shared global landscape.
This is a reality so profound, it transcends even the most resolute skepticism.
bfrhodes99 