In the aftermath of the incident involving Charlie Kirk, I find myself pondering the circumstances surrounding the shooting, particularly the origin of the weapon used. Typically, in such events, media reports meticulously trace the firearm’s source, offering insights into the acquisition process.

The origins of the item remained shrouded in mystery. Did he acquire it through purchase, receive it as a gift, or perhaps obtain it through less conventional means? The true nature of his possession was uncertain. Just how much did he practice in the previous week, month, or perhaps year? I would like to know how commonly he used the gun. I mean people generally don’t shoot that well…with the gun he is going to use.

I practice regularly with my gun. It helps to improve my accuracy and confidence. Anyone knows most of us are not capable of just picking up a rifle and the next day, successfully shoot someone through the neck the next day.

I don’t care what the man’s name is nearly as much as I want to know who taught the guy how to hold the weapon and carefully pull the trigger. Even how to breathe is important from that range. Breathing while pulling the trigger can throw the aim off.

Uncertainty shrouded the number of bullets he carried. Typically, such details would be reported, yet this instance remained conspicuously silent. The absence of information raised questions about the circumstances surrounding this particular event.

Okay. You get the idea. I could go on asking these questions. Just seems to me, this time, far more than previous instances to be of a collaborative endeavor with multiple individuals working in concert to support a singular mission.