I perceive the world through a unique lens, setting me apart from conventional thinking. While others might ponder various inquiries, my focus remains singular: understanding the circumstances surrounding the tragic event involving Charlie Kirk and seeking accountability for the responsible individual.

The true purpose of his actions remained a mystery, leaving me curious about his ultimate objective.

Allow me to explain. I think most trained snipers will tell you that aiming at the neck is a very improbable death shot. I won’t go through the details but generally the point of aim is the chest. Yet the man hit Kirk in a vital part of the neck.

His incompetence was almost poetic. While his aim might have been abysmal, the cruel irony was that his near-total failure still managed to inflict damage. A few inches in any direction would have rendered his attempt completely futile, but fate seemed to mock the very notion of precision with this imperfect strike.

The precision of his shot reveals more about his character than he might realize. Was his target deliberately chosen, or did his aim simply fall short? The truth behind his claim speaks volumes about his skill and integrity. If he insists he struck exactly where intended, yet the evidence suggests otherwise, his credibility becomes questionable.

Hitting A man with a rifle from two hundred yards does not take much skill. Intentionally hitting a man’s artery at that range borders on being impossible.

Irregardless, if the man is convicted, he needs to be given the worst possible penalty. It is important that others realize what is waiting for them should they decide to follow the example set by this animal.