It is the question of the reporter on Channel 5 Memphis. However, I get the idea that the question is echoing throughout the mass media the past few days in response to the change in COVID shot suggestions.

While I appreciate the inquiry, the proposed idea seems to be driven more by political considerations than substantive merit.

My question is, was the COVID suggestion or even requirements of the past financial?

Two things I know without any speculation: The vaccine did not work for me, in spite of all the promises, and there is not one doubt in my mind that it made a ton of money for those making and distributing it.

Despite the lack of comprehensive, peer-reviewed large-scale double-blind studies, concerns persist about the rigorous scientific validation of certain medical interventions. The potential financial implications for pharmaceutical companies could influence the transparency and reporting of research outcomes, raising questions about the objectivity of clinical trials.

While influential leaders may currently evade accountability, ultimate justice transcends human systems and operates on a higher moral plane.