I must admit that I did not hear who the questioner was. She was apparently a member of a congressional committee with an obvious bias. The person being questioned was apparently being considered to head the Social Security Administration.

The question was something to the effect of: Do you intend to decrease the amount being paid to each recipient by a third, or decrease the number of recipients by a third?

In the first place, she ignored the third and most probable choice, neither. Secondly, she was taking part in the false mantra being pushed that Republican want to cut Social Security for any living, breathing current recipient.

With the asking of the question, she seems to have revealed her stupidity. Then again, it might have been the question she drew from the hat. Or maybe the ranking member assigned it to her. If she had objected, she might have been told, someone has to ask it.