From Good to Worst

When new leadership takes over an organization, one would hope that the organization will improve. In this case, the outcome was unfortunately predictable.

When the Memphis City school system merged with the Shelby County school system, control of the county schools effectively transitioned to the city’s control.

The county schools, under the control of the city, have now become the worst school system in the state. Perhaps they are competing for the worst in the country.

It is no wonder that people are fleeing from Shelby County Schools. They even changed the name by adding “Memphis” to the front of the name.

The Memphis, Shelby County Schools are currently undergoing a transition as the Tennessee Legislature assumes control. While the legislature’s intentions may be well-meaning, the task of improving the schools’ performance and outcomes is a significant challenge that will require a comprehensive and collaborative approach involving all stakeholders.

As a resident of Mississippi, I may not have a direct stake in the affairs of Shelby County, but I find the situation regarding the thousands of students attending schools in Desoto County to be quite intriguing. While I may not be directly involved, I do enjoy observing and reporting on the developments in this matter. My goal is to provide timely and accurate updates to keep the public informed.

Then again, should they really get intelligent and turn it all over to me, there won’t be much to report. It would all be straightened out in four weeks, maybe five.

The first step would be to fire all the upper management. All they ever do is get in the way.

Logic?

When I arrived in the country of Vietnam while serving as a marine, I was told to take these small pills once a day. I was informed that they would prevent me from contracting malaria.

Now I am in the US. Now I am told that if I take virtually the same pill, it can result in dangerous side effects.

So now, what is it? Is it a malaria prevention or is it a dangerous medication? Does the medication become dangerous magically because I take it to prevent the China virus?

By the way, do you know this medicine is used virtually everywhere that they have problems with malaria? Do you know that it causes fewer side effects than about any vaccine? Did you know it causes fewer side effects than the vaccines for China virus.

Incidentally, it is also better at preventing and curing the virus than the vaccines.

The question, of course, is why do they insist on us taking the vaccine and discourage quinine? The answer is simple. The shots make big pharmaceutical companies a fortune, while quinine doesn’t. Each tablet is just a few dollars.

To get to the heart of the matter, it’s often helpful to examine the financial incentives at play.

Just What Makes Federal Employees Special?

On a crisp September morning, I arrived at my workplace, ready to start another day. It was a routine occurrence, much like the countless previous workdays I had experienced over the past twelve years.

My manager requested my presence, which was not entirely unexpected. Occasionally, they assigned me special tasks or sought clarification on my work. While not an uncommon occurrence, I approached the meeting with an open mind, ready to address any questions or concerns.

How-some-ever, this time the situation was distinct. Following a brief discussion, I departed the premises, never to return.

I was confused and disappointed to learn that I was among the twenty percent of employees who were let go that day. Despite my hard work and dedication, the decision did not seem to make sense. As I left the premises, I was informed that the company had undergone a significant restructuring, resulting in layoffs across all departments, including maintenance, sales, and software support. Given the size of the organization, this was a substantial reduction in workforce.

They acknowledged their mistake in letting me go and offered to rehire me. They admitted they were aware that my contributions were more extensive than they had realized. While it was a difficult decision, I ultimately chose to decline their offer. There is no need to delve into the specifics.

The point is this: What is so special about federal employees that they should be immune from being fired? I mean, I got fired. Why should a federal employee who has their feet on their desk be immune?

Why shouldn’t federal employees be required to provide periodic accounting? If they are not performing their duties, why can’t they be terminated? If their absence would not be missed, why shouldn’t they be provided with their severance package?

Just why are government employees better than those of us drawing a civilian paycheck?

A Word of Hope and Encouragement for the Pope

…Such as it is. I do not delude myself into believing that he reads my posts.

Nonetheless, I sincerely hope that he recovers to the fullest. I firmly believe that his life, as well as all of our lives, are in the hands of God.

Even more, I hope he will take this time to ensure that he truly knows Jesus as his personal savior. I am sure many simply assume he does. If he does not, it would be a very costly assumption.

After the Lies

While some may find my language overly strong, I believe it is necessary to convey the gravity of the situation. The countless deaths and immense economic damage that have resulted from these mistakes warrant a forceful response. It is important to address these issues directly and without equivocation.

HOW-SOME–EVER! The actions were deliberate, not accidental. There is a distinction between intentional and unintentional wrongdoing. For this reason, I criticize the leadership of the CDC and, by extension, the previous administration.

And now, somehow, we are supposed to look to the CDC for future guidance. Why? I, personally, have had three blood clots after taking the so-called vaccination the China virus. Not so much as one before. Now, I must take very expensive blood thinners for the rest of my life.

Now, they are telling us to take the vaccines, for the China virus, for the flu, for pneumonia, etc. Are we supposed to trust them? When they require all the various shots before going to school, are we supposed to just take their word for it that they are safe?

Don’t get me wrong. I am in favor of the shots for measles, mumps, etc. However, maybe it is time to take another look at the safety of them. Given the CDC’s record, I do believe it’s warranted. Moreover, would it really hurt? Is the CDC afraid of what will be found? Are those who produce them afraid that they might have to take something off the market until a problem is addressed? Mostly, are they afraid that they, the industry, will take still another hit to their reputation?

The recent concerns about the measles outbreak are understandable and valid. However, it is also important to consider the potential health implications of uncontrolled border crossings.

It suggests that their interests, motivations, and endeavors are misguided or misaligned. It also suggests that when I used the word “lie,” it is more appropriate than using the word “fib.” Indeed, the word “lie” is not strong enough.

Hostages?

By definition, can a person who has died be considered a hostage? It’s perhaps just my own personal opinion, but I believe that, in order to qualify as a hostage, the person should be alive and breathing.

Nonetheless, my main desire is to address another point. The release of prisoners seems a little lopsided. I do not know the actual ratio, but it seems to be approximately one to fifty, more or less.

I simply couldn’t understand. How could the Israelis allow the Palestinians to have such an uneven settlement? Then it became obvious to me. While the terrorists are imprisoned, shooting them would not be permitted. Moreover, they would feel safe and secure. Once released, they are neither safe nor secure.

Pretenders or Actors

When I was a boy, I was a pretender. I played cops and robbers, cowboys and Indians, and of course we won World War II many times, without getting wounded even once.

I watched men in movies and on TV who were also pretending. The difference is, they get paid a lot.

And, of course, they got to ride real horses. Now, is that fair? After all these years, I never once got to ride a horse off into the sunset.

Solving Problems

Over the years, I have noticed a large number of people who are willing to bring me problems. I tell them, “I have problems. It’s solutions I am looking for.”

Well, I don’t find many with solutions. Those I do find expect payment in return. Imagine that.

President Trump faces significant challenges, which he continues to address with determination and skill. He often finds solutions to complex issues with remarkable efficiency and effectiveness.

The Washington, D.C. metropolitan area is known for its high property values, making it challenging for many to find affordable housing. Purchasing a home in this region often requires significant financial investment, which can be daunting for prospective homeowners.

The real estate market appears to have shifted, with an influx of prime properties available. This change may be attributed to recent layoffs, as some individuals are now seeking employment opportunities elsewhere. It seems a solution managed by Trump without intention.

Moreover, a few of the former government employees will be confronted with an entirely new experience: work.

Redundancy in Writing/Speech

One error I must watch for when writing is redundancy. If I’m not careful, I’ll use “also” at the start of a sentence and then end it with “too.” It’s not that I don’t know better, but I still catch myself doing it. Even worse, sometimes I don’t catch the redundancy.

It is but an example. Also, I do it in other ways, too. Then, while proofreading, I’ll pass right over it without noticing it.

It does remind me of a common redundancy we see in the proverbial murder mystery. Though it does bother my wife, most of us do not care. I mean, in the mystery, do they ever find a living body?

One phrase I wasn’t familiar with until recently is the “old adage.” Did you know that “adage” means an old saying? I had a chuckle when I discovered that. Yet, using the word “adage” on its own can feel a bit strange and incomplete.

One more redundancy I realize I should avoid nowadays is dishonest Democratic politicians. Democratic politicians is more than sufficient to express it.

I Suggest a New Law

This is an unusual suggestion. Typically, I would recommend against having too many laws. However, in this case, I believe this could be a beneficial law that is worth considering.

To ensure the law remains effective, it is important to limit the involvement of lawyers. The length should be kept to no more than four paragraphs, as any longer would likely make the text overly complex. If lawyers are allowed to contribute, the law could become excessively lengthy and difficult to understand, even for legal professionals.

It would say something like this:

All authorities issuing death certificates shall send a copy to the Social Security Administration on paper.

To prevent the inadvertent issuance of false documents, the Social Security Administration should send a registered letter to the individual reported as deceased, requesting verification of their status. If the person is alive but unable to respond directly, an appropriate representative should be able to do so on their behalf.

Intentionally creating false or misleading documents is considered fraudulent and may result in legal consequences.

If the recipient does not respond to the letter within ninety days, they will be presumed deceased and removed from the active register. No further payments will be made to that individual, except for any applicable survivor benefits.

An appropriate consequence should be included. The advantage of the law is that it would prevent sending payments to deceased individuals, and it would be easily understood by all.

The process of distributing payments to individuals located outside the United States may require a more nuanced approach. It would be prudent to consult legal experts who can navigate the complexities of international law and ensure compliance with relevant regulations.

The advantages of this approach are straightforward:

1) It encourages ethical behavior and accountability.

2) It helps preserve the Social Security system for future generations.

3) It protects the system from those who would seek to exploit it for personal gain, ensuring its sustainability for younger individuals.