She knew what the questions would be. No one had to tell her. It just stood to reason what the questions would be. None the less, it wouldn’t have surprised me if someone did tell her that someone would ask the one question that was on everyone’s mind.

Moreover, she knew the answer. She knew exactly what she was going to do after taking the oath office. The problem is that she can’t say. You see everyone knows what she would do. She just knows she can’t say. She must go through the pretense of not knowing. If she said what she would do, she knows then that no one would vote for her.

And so it is, she won’t say her answer aloud nor will she say what she won’t reply. And so it is that she won’t answer anything. She dodges all questions and instead of speaking to the question, she speaks about what she wants to talk about. She realizes she is facing the reality that if she says what she will do, she will never have a chance to do them.

And so she sounds very much like I sound here, speaking in circles. It is what politicians do when they know an honest answer is political suicide. I guess a person can assume that they will do what they refuse to say what they will do.

Then too, I guess it is conceivable that she knows not what she will do. I suppose that is possible too. If a person knows not anything, it does make it difficult to sound intelligent.

Incidentally, I would still like to hear Kamala’s definition of a what an assault weapon is. I mean, if she is going to be The Commander in Chief of all our nation’s forces, shouldn’t she know what an assault weapon is? I haven’t heard anyone ask her and I certainly don’t think she is going to just tell me. Do you suppose she might be embarrassed if she was put in a position where she had to come up with one. Would she just stammer and studder as she has been or will she come up with the proper definition, assuming there is one?