He seems to to be making a little off of it now. You can’t watch TV hardly nowadays without him effectively saying, you pay us and we’ll make sure no one steals your house. If you noticed that that sounds a lot like a protection racket, I noticed that too.

Now let’s see. Seems to me as if he was in a position to fix that. Why didn’t he? He was in a position to resolve ID theft. Why didn’t he?

I really liked a lot of what the former speaker did, but I am quickly losing my respect for him. I am asking myself, why should I, effectively have to pay a protection racket to keep my house?

Where are the laws. Where is the enforcement element. Why aren’t those perpetrators of grand larceny in prison. Yet, they don’t even run. They know not one charge will be leveled against them, though they just stole and sold a 300 thousand dollar home.

And what is done to resolve the problem created by the thief? Does the rightful owner get his title back? What happens to the person who bought the stolen home? Can he get any of his money back?

Worse still, can it be that the thief can operate from outside of the US? How is it that we can go after him. How is it that we can even identify him?

Then again, who cares, until it happens to them?

And after…Newt says, should have paid us. We would have stopped it. The thief will go free, but we would have saved your home, until next time.